From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52194) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zvej2-0000LO-BJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 00:10:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zveiz-0002gL-1e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 00:10:40 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:60982) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zveiy-0002gH-Of for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 00:10:36 -0500 From: "Li, Liang Z" Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 05:10:26 +0000 Message-ID: References: <563E16AF.8070209@openvz.org> <1446910812-13044-1-git-send-email-den@openvz.org> In-Reply-To: <1446910812-13044-1-git-send-email-den@openvz.org> Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] migration: qemu_savevm_state_cleanup becomes mandatory operation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Denis V. Lunev" Cc: Amit Shah , Paolo Bonzini , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Juan Quintela > since commit > commit 94f5a43704129ca4995aa3385303c5ae225bde42 > Author: Liang Li > Date: Mon Nov 2 15:37:00 2015 +0800 >=20 > migration: defer migration_end & blk_mig_cleanup >=20 > when actual .cleanup callbacks calling was removed from complete operatio= ns. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev > CC: Paolo Bonzini > CC: Juan Quintela > CC: Amit Shah > --- > migration/savevm.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >=20 > diff --git a/migration/savevm.c b/migration/savevm.c index e05158d..9f223= 0f > 100644 > --- a/migration/savevm.c > +++ b/migration/savevm.c > @@ -942,8 +942,8 @@ static int qemu_savevm_state(QEMUFile *f, Error > **errp) > qemu_savevm_state_complete(f); > ret =3D qemu_file_get_error(f); > } > + qemu_savevm_state_cleanup(); > if (ret !=3D 0) { > - qemu_savevm_state_cleanup(); > error_setg_errno(errp, -ret, "Error while writing VM state"); > } > return ret; > -- > 2.5.0 >=20 Yes, you are right. Thanks a lot. BTW, can this patch fix the regression you reported? Reviewed-by: Liang Li