From: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, stefan.bigler@keymile.com,
"Holger brunck" <holger.brunck@keymile.com>,
"Anders Grafström" <grfstrm@users.sourceforge.net>,
"Michael Cashwell" <mboards@prograde.net>
Subject: Re: Numonyx NOR and chip->mutex bug?
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:02:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <OF4FEF6422.2B862198-ONC1257833.005D4A8B-C1257833.005D9A9E@transmode.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFBD6C1723.E5530FEB-ONC1257833.005BF5C1-C1257833.005C2C61@transmode.se>
> > > Here is another idea, don't resume between every write_buffer etc. If less than 500 us has passed, just continue with the next write_buffer. That would be much more efficient.
> >
> > Wouldn't that extend the wrong time. That would ensure the erase stays *suspended* for at least 500us. But doesn't W602 specify that an erase should be allowed *to run* for 500us before suspension?
> >
> > It seems the other way around.
>
> eeh, yes :(
And this reminds me that if the spec is to be trusted, the delay should be just before
erase suspend, otherwise you miss the time between the initial erase and the first suspend.
Jocke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-10 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-25 18:14 Numonyx NOR and chip->mutex bug? Michael Cashwell
2011-01-25 18:56 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-01-25 22:03 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-01-25 23:09 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-02 16:20 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-02 17:37 ` Stefan Bigler
2011-02-02 20:12 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-02 21:19 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-03 8:11 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-03 9:50 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-03 15:24 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-03 16:38 ` Stefan Bigler
2011-02-03 23:18 ` Stefan Bigler
2011-02-04 10:47 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-04 11:04 ` Stefan Bigler
2011-02-04 12:26 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-04 12:35 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-04 12:42 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-04 13:05 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-04 13:25 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-04 16:45 ` Stefan Bigler
2011-02-04 16:55 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-04 17:09 ` Michael Cashwell
[not found] ` <OF42EF <F66AF016-8A2B-4116-BE49-CE05B91BE50F@prograde.net>
[not found] ` <OF42EF<F66AF016-8A2B-4116-BE49-CE05B91BE50F@prograde.net>
2011-02-05 10:29 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-05 19:19 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-05 21:47 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-06 9:46 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-06 15:49 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-06 17:29 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-06 21:13 ` Michael Cashwell
[not found] ` <OF2C1ABD39 <4D5005E4.1040506@keymile.com>
[not found] ` <OFFF2C6D34.91E5D6C3-ONC1257 <96BD3889-E8AD-408D-8275-ED1A5FD55F1B@prograde.net>
[not found] ` <OF2C1ABD39<4D5005E4.1040506@keymile.com>
[not found] ` <OFFF2C6D34.91E5D6C3-ONC1257<96BD3889-E8AD-408D-8275-ED1A5FD55F1B@prograde.net>
[not found] ` <OF9738D658.F46<4C117A67-5057-4ACD-8EBE-04E9C782570C@prograde.net>
[not found] ` <OF6D40AC82.1008D3DD-ONC1 <4D53E660.4020305@users.sourceforge.net>
2011-02-06 21:20 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-07 14:47 ` Stefan Bigler
2011-02-07 15:01 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-07 15:46 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-07 15:52 ` Stefan Bigler
2011-02-07 16:22 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-07 16:46 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-07 17:08 ` Stefan Bigler
2011-02-07 19:04 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-09 19:52 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-09 20:13 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-09 21:59 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-10 13:21 ` Anders Grafström
2011-02-10 14:04 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-10 15:04 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-10 15:59 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-10 16:05 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-10 16:41 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-10 16:46 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-10 17:02 ` Joakim Tjernlund [this message]
2011-02-10 17:10 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-10 17:20 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-10 17:47 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-10 18:26 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-11 18:03 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-12 10:47 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-14 15:59 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-14 15:44 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-10 16:43 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-10 17:54 ` Anders Grafström
2011-02-11 15:05 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-11 15:39 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-14 16:15 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-11 17:00 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-10 15:43 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-10 15:51 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-24 10:50 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-24 11:36 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-24 14:28 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-10 14:53 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-06 9:40 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-06 14:55 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-07 15:10 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-07 15:48 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2011-02-03 13:24 ` Michael Cashwell
2011-02-03 14:01 ` Joakim Tjernlund
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=OF4FEF6422.2B862198-ONC1257833.005D4A8B-C1257833.005D9A9E@transmode.se \
--to=joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se \
--cc=grfstrm@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=holger.brunck@keymile.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mboards@prograde.net \
--cc=stefan.bigler@keymile.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.