All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bernard Metzler" <BMT@zurich.ibm.com>
To: "Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	"Doug Ledford" <dledford@redhat.com>,
	"Linux Next Mailing List" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re:  Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rdma tree
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 14:28:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <OF8B5D0A35.3AB4C2D3-ON00258431.004F7CF8-00258431.004F7D00@notes.na.collabserv.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190708140858.GC23966@mellanox.com>

-----"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@mellanox.com> wrote: -----

>To: "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, "Bernard Metzler"
><bmt@zurich.ibm.com>
>From: "Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@mellanox.com>
>Date: 07/08/2019 04:09PM
>Cc: "Doug Ledford" <dledford@redhat.com>, "Linux Next Mailing List"
><linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List"
><linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
>Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the
>rdma tree
>
>On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 01:03:51PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>> 
>> In file included from include/asm-generic/percpu.h:7,
>>                  from arch/x86/include/asm/percpu.h:544,
>>                  from arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:6,
>>                  from include/linux/preempt.h:78,
>>                  from include/linux/spinlock.h:51,
>>                  from include/linux/seqlock.h:36,
>>                  from include/linux/time.h:6,
>>                  from include/linux/ktime.h:24,
>>                  from include/linux/timer.h:6,
>>                  from include/linux/netdevice.h:24,
>>                  from drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_main.c:8:
>> include/linux/percpu-defs.h:92:33: warning: '__pcpu_unique_use_cnt'
>initialized and declared 'extern'
>>   extern __PCPU_DUMMY_ATTRS char __pcpu_unique_##name;  \
>>                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/percpu-defs.h:115:2: note: in expansion of macro
>'DEFINE_PER_CPU_SECTION'
>>   DEFINE_PER_CPU_SECTION(type, name, "")
>>   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_main.c:129:8: note: in expansion of
>macro 'DEFINE_PER_CPU'
>>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(atomic_t, use_cnt = ATOMIC_INIT(0));
>>         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/percpu-defs.h:93:26: error: redefinition of
>'__pcpu_unique_use_cnt'
>>   __PCPU_DUMMY_ATTRS char __pcpu_unique_##name;   \
>>                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/percpu-defs.h:115:2: note: in expansion of macro
>'DEFINE_PER_CPU_SECTION'
>>   DEFINE_PER_CPU_SECTION(type, name, "")
>>   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_main.c:129:8: note: in expansion of
>macro 'DEFINE_PER_CPU'
>>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(atomic_t, use_cnt = ATOMIC_INIT(0));
>
>Bernard, 
>
>This looks like the wrong way to use DEFINE_PER_CPU these days. I'm
>not sure why my compiles don't hit it, or why 0-day didn't say
>something
>
>Looking at the other atomic_t PER_CPU users they just rely on
>automatic zero initialization, so this should just be:
>
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(atomic_t, use_cnt);
>
>?
>
>Please confirm ASAP.
>

Hi Jason,

Thanks for  bringing this up. Indeed, that explicit
initialization seem to be inappropriate. Can you please
fix that as you suggest?

Thanks very much,
Bernard.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-08 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-08  3:03 linux-next: build failure after merge of the rdma tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-08 14:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-08 14:28 ` Bernard Metzler [this message]
2019-07-08 14:56   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-08 15:08   ` Bernard Metzler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=OF8B5D0A35.3AB4C2D3-ON00258431.004F7CF8-00258431.004F7D00@notes.na.collabserv.com \
    --to=bmt@zurich.ibm.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.