All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com>
To: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	shayagr@amazon.com, sameehj@amazon.com,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
	Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>,
	"Fijalkowski, Maciej" <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
	Tirthendu <tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 bpf-next 00/14] mvneta: introduce XDP multi-buffer support
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 23:29:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YHoBtldcPyKNFKPv@lore-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ8uoz1MOYLzyy7xXq_fmpKDEakxSomzfM76Szjr5gWsqHc9jQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2945 bytes --]

> 
> Took your patches for a test run with the AF_XDP sample xdpsock on an
> i40e card and the throughput degradation is between 2 to 6% depending
> on the setup and microbenchmark within xdpsock that is executed. And
> this is without sending any multi frame packets. Just single frame
> ones. Tirtha made changes to the i40e driver to support this new
> interface so that is being included in the measurements.

Hi Magnus,

thx for working on it. Assuming the fragmented part is only initialized/accessed
if mb is set (so for multi frame packets), I would not expect any throughput
degradation in the single frame scenario. Can you please share the i40e
support added by Tirtha?

> 
> What performance do you see with the mvneta card? How much are we
> willing to pay for this feature when it is not being used or can we in
> some way selectively turn it on only when needed?

IIRC I did not get sensible throughput degradation on mvneta but I will re-run
the tests running an updated bpf-next tree.

Regards,
Lorenzo

> 
> Thanks: Magnus
> 
> > Eelco Chaudron (4):
> >   bpf: add multi-buff support to the bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() API
> >   bpd: add multi-buffer support to xdp copy helpers
> >   bpf: add new frame_length field to the XDP ctx
> >   bpf: update xdp_adjust_tail selftest to include multi-buffer
> >
> > Lorenzo Bianconi (10):
> >   xdp: introduce mb in xdp_buff/xdp_frame
> >   xdp: add xdp_shared_info data structure
> >   net: mvneta: update mb bit before passing the xdp buffer to eBPF layer
> >   xdp: add multi-buff support to xdp_return_{buff/frame}
> >   net: mvneta: add multi buffer support to XDP_TX
> >   net: mvneta: enable jumbo frames for XDP
> >   net: xdp: add multi-buff support to xdp_build_skb_from_fram
> >   bpf: move user_size out of bpf_test_init
> >   bpf: introduce multibuff support to bpf_prog_test_run_xdp()
> >   bpf: test_run: add xdp_shared_info pointer in bpf_test_finish
> >     signature
> >
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c         | 182 ++++++++++--------
> >  include/linux/filter.h                        |   7 +
> >  include/net/xdp.h                             | 105 +++++++++-
> >  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                      |   1 +
> >  net/bpf/test_run.c                            | 109 +++++++++--
> >  net/core/filter.c                             | 134 ++++++++++++-
> >  net/core/xdp.c                                | 103 +++++++++-
> >  tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                |   1 +
> >  .../bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_tail.c          | 105 ++++++++++
> >  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c    | 127 ++++++++----
> >  .../bpf/progs/test_xdp_adjust_tail_grow.c     |  17 +-
> >  .../bpf/progs/test_xdp_adjust_tail_shrink.c   |  32 ++-
> >  .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c    |   3 +-
> >  13 files changed, 767 insertions(+), 159 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.30.2
> >
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-16 21:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-08 12:50 [PATCH v8 bpf-next 00/14] mvneta: introduce XDP multi-buffer support Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:50 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 01/14] xdp: introduce mb in xdp_buff/xdp_frame Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 18:17   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-04-09 16:03     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-29 13:36   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-04-29 13:54     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:50 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 02/14] xdp: add xdp_shared_info data structure Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 13:39   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-04-08 14:26     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 18:06   ` kernel test robot
2021-04-08 18:06     ` kernel test robot
2021-04-08 12:50 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 03/14] net: mvneta: update mb bit before passing the xdp buffer to eBPF layer Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 18:19   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-04-09 16:24     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:50 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 04/14] xdp: add multi-buff support to xdp_return_{buff/frame} Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 18:30   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-04-09 16:28     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:50 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 05/14] net: mvneta: add multi buffer support to XDP_TX Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 18:40   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-04-09 16:36     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:50 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 06/14] net: mvneta: enable jumbo frames for XDP Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:50 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 07/14] net: xdp: add multi-buff support to xdp_build_skb_from_fram Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:51 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 08/14] bpf: add multi-buff support to the bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() API Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 19:15   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-04-08 20:54     ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-04-09 18:13       ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:51 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 09/14] bpd: add multi-buffer support to xdp copy helpers Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 20:57   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-04-09 18:19     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 21:04   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-04-14  8:08     ` Eelco Chaudron
2021-04-08 12:51 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 10/14] bpf: add new frame_length field to the XDP ctx Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:51 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 11/14] bpf: move user_size out of bpf_test_init Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:51 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 12/14] bpf: introduce multibuff support to bpf_prog_test_run_xdp() Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:51 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 13/14] bpf: test_run: add xdp_shared_info pointer in bpf_test_finish signature Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:51 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 14/14] bpf: update xdp_adjust_tail selftest to include multi-buffer Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-09  0:56 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 00/14] mvneta: introduce XDP multi-buffer support John Fastabend
2021-04-09 20:16   ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-13 15:16   ` Eelco Chaudron
2021-04-16 14:27 ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-04-16 21:29   ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2021-04-16 23:00     ` Daniel Borkmann
2021-04-18 16:18   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-04-19  6:20     ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-04-19  6:55       ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-20 13:49         ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-04-21 12:47           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-04-21 14:12             ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-04-21 15:39               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-04-22 10:24                 ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-04-22 14:42                   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-04-22 15:05                     ` Crash for i40e on net-next (was: [PATCH v8 bpf-next 00/14] mvneta: introduce XDP multi-buffer support) Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-04-23  5:28                       ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-04-23 16:43                         ` Alexander Duyck
2021-04-25  9:45                           ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-04-27 18:28   ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 00/14] mvneta: introduce XDP multi-buffer support Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-28  7:41     ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-04-29 12:49       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YHoBtldcPyKNFKPv@lore-desk \
    --to=lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saeed@kernel.org \
    --cc=sameehj@amazon.com \
    --cc=shayagr@amazon.com \
    --cc=tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.