Re: RFC: remove set_fs for m68k

[Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>]

On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 08:54:26AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 7:43 PM Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > having run stress tests on a kernel with Al Viro's signal handling fixes
> > applied for the past two days with no further errors, I am now quite
> > confident that the format error I saw in resume_userspace() and a bus
> > error in setup_frame() were caused by multiple pending signals, and the
> > resulting stack mangling that Al's patches fix.
> 
> Sounds good. Except you say "Al Viro's signal handling fixes" without
> giving any context, so I have no idea which patches you are referring
> to.
> 
> Regardless, if there's some fixes queue that also removes set_fs()
> from m68k, I'm willing to take it for 5.15 just to have another
> architecture down and done with.
> 
> And even if the set_fs() patches might still be under discussion, the
> format errors have been going on for some time, so the signal fixes -
> wherever they are - seem to be no-brainers if they fix those.

	vfs.git #{untested,fixes}.m68k, series posted to m68k folks back in July.
3 commits in there, and I've some local followup cleanups (ifdefs in m68k/signal.c
are bloody confused), but the latter got stalled by ptrace and signal review and
documentation writing...

	See https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/YP2dTQPm1wGPWFgD@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk/T/
for original thread.