From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24616C433EF for ; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 11:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232878AbiAOLHs (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Jan 2022 06:07:48 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43246 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229569AbiAOLHr (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Jan 2022 06:07:47 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x333.google.com (mail-wm1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::333]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8617C061574; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 03:07:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x333.google.com with SMTP id q9-20020a7bce89000000b00349e697f2fbso11740959wmj.0; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 03:07:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=49cMYEAT/BjVZYMFgdWLTUrWi8kXzuhxxLdsLpUVzRY=; b=FgYLDqMsrjmJVI94AWq+39BBdWqiGQi+RYxzrI8+tdB9wpgi+nEz7kCya3laXaVySq KsqfcUPxC1w+rh9/I4aJDiiA++H+2k+FEUjWq3y3x2PA+cH53OlUrxAdJ1A9Eao5GAKy pRd3Vn7zoAH88AmV8u/pkm0EtpEVlQI+hPdVBfOQ2TuxTbk38hy+oMGkw+bI1LHDM63C di4bGeP1w3BvzDB7JUjsMU51ozNn3CNOSBBJki8ChDQMHvCunzw8luwJmkE+xUY4Qjdv Z8u3GyC+0ziRzAbMhy4ULBrEOT5q2AMTHNFGdQmeMzx3xTjQ7pU8fBfFvBqmJ9Zfeojn Z1AA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=49cMYEAT/BjVZYMFgdWLTUrWi8kXzuhxxLdsLpUVzRY=; b=1zOKIaofQyZZsaMnCHqd1VODcYL02sjXdccn2Cc3mQ7FMtmmIGpfdYAdfmErx6i6LW Fk4NU79kC4opcQaEGS9/yuJ4bL9sUbPW3518fsKdmBYx+S2RP/nKC7TO7MbTUfhDd+4a 6KKv+dmV4YAujpzezG4jZfIReHnyi9tvJvgEsaB+BwEHWqqGJQikM/DAEpyJcMXG1arU Cx9PH6tiF45woFFR15GqY+dg0ATDY/JwCCxAHD2QgxGud27AXUvTPEtBqhhSej0cXTAB gz7obt/IduYjg2q3WaEo+ajLJT4ACjQ3hD0hkRsNNLbcGStpTaW6iDYV7xQnkCEaM+4D MuFQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532TX2k5LMiGWFZIsRbl98dGcDJQ7oWefOD1+Bn7KFc8NtOBGJ6/ tScFH8aMg3yeYZ857q5c4+8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyQZKvhIkFcqUMtT0cMX9nAWsLhFBVaHcGDZozXWpg7zZl/MNTcjdFJcKSs6EGUtSJ1mhb9lg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6d49:: with SMTP id k9mr11985247wri.530.1642244865500; Sat, 15 Jan 2022 03:07:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian (host-2-98-43-34.as13285.net. [2.98.43.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a3sm10009010wri.89.2022.01.15.03.07.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 15 Jan 2022 03:07:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2022 11:07:43 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/25] 5.10.92-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220114081542.698002137@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220114081542.698002137@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 09:16:08AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.92 release. > There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 16 Jan 2022 08:15:33 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220106): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220106): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220106): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220106): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/626 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/628 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip