On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 05:19:04PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 03:05:21PM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:

> > is it the:

> > [    7.471809] tda9950 0-0034: driver requires an interrupt

> > that you're talking about Liviu?

> Yes, that is the warning.

That doesn't look too worrying TBH, if it's causing confusion we should
just either fix the tda998x driver to not instantiate the tda9950 unless
it has an interrupt or lower the severity of the log message in the
tda9950 code.  It's certanly not something that should block use in a
defconfig.

Ideally we'd not be using the wildcard compatible in the tda998x and
would know if the CEC functionality was there but I think that ship has
disappeared over the horizon at this point, and in any case someone
might just not want to support CEC for some reason.