All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	tj@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jeyu@kernel.org,
	shuah@kernel.org, bvanassche@acm.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	joe@perches.com, keescook@chromium.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	minchan@kernel.org, linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/6] selftests: add tests_sysfs module
Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 16:47:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YopM5XGMdqVCU+bL@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fsl1iqg0.ffs@tglx>

On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 04:37:19PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Greg,
> 
> On Fri, Dec 03 2021 at 16:29, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 11:44:57AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> 
> sorry for missing this thread. I came accross it now as I'm looking into
> the licensing mess again.
> 
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR copyleft-next-0.3.1
> >
> > Again, sorry, but no, I am going to object to this license as you are
> > only accessing a GPL-v2-only api.  Any other license on a file that
> > interacts with that, especially for core stuff like testing the
> > functionality of this code, needs to have that same license.  Sorry.
> 
> That's a bogus argument. First of all the code is dual licensed and
> second we have enough code in the kernel which is licensed MIT/BSD and
> happily can access the GPL-v2-only APIs.
> 
> Aside of that we have already code in the kernel which is dual licensed
> 
>      GPL-2.0-or-later OR copyleft-next-0.3.1
> 
> We just can't make it SPDX clean because copyleft-next-0.3.1 is not in
> LICENSING.
> 
> While I agree that we want to keep the number of licenses as small as
> possible, we cannot really dictate which dual licensing options a
> submitter selects unless the license is GPL-2.0-only incompatible, which
> copyleft-next is not.
> 
> Can we just get over this, add the license with the SPDX identifier and
> move on?

From what I recall, I had technical reasons I didn't take this series,
but that was a long time ago and I would be glad to review it again if
it were rebased and resubmitted after the next merge window is closed.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-22 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-29 18:44 [PATCH v9 0/6] test_sysfs: add new selftest for sysfs Luis Chamberlain
2021-10-29 18:44 ` [PATCH v9 1/6] LICENSES: Add the copyleft-next-0.3.1 license Luis Chamberlain
2022-05-23 21:10   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-24 13:59     ` Richard Fontana
2022-05-25 17:10     ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-05-25 19:13     ` Bradley M. Kuhn
2022-05-25 21:50       ` J Lovejoy
2022-05-25 22:29         ` Bradley M. Kuhn
2022-05-23 21:22   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-25 16:57     ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-05-25 20:51       ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-25 23:53         ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-05-23 21:27   ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-25 16:43     ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-05-25 17:05       ` Bird, Tim
2022-05-25 18:11         ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-05-25 19:05           ` Bird, Tim
2022-05-25 19:44             ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-05-25 22:16             ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-06-02  4:11               ` Bird, Tim
2022-06-02  6:20                 ` gregkh
2022-06-02 19:41                   ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-06-02 19:30                 ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-10-29 18:44 ` [PATCH v9 2/6] testing: use the copyleft-next-0.3.1 SPDX tag Luis Chamberlain
2021-10-29 18:44 ` [PATCH v9 3/6] selftests: add tests_sysfs module Luis Chamberlain
2021-12-03 15:29   ` Greg KH
2021-12-09  1:48     ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-12-10 21:39       ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-12-14 19:31       ` [copyleft-next] " Richard Fontana
2022-05-22 14:37     ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-22 14:47       ` Greg KH [this message]
2022-05-22 15:06         ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-05-23 19:37           ` Luis Chamberlain
2021-10-29 18:44 ` [PATCH v9 4/6] kernfs: add initial failure injection support Luis Chamberlain
2021-10-29 18:44 ` [PATCH v9 5/6] test_sysfs: add support to use kernfs failure injection Luis Chamberlain
2021-10-29 18:45 ` [PATCH v9 6/6] kernel/module: add documentation for try_module_get() Luis Chamberlain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YopM5XGMdqVCU+bL@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.