From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0276C00140 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 17:33:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229906AbiHBRd0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2022 13:33:26 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58054 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229461AbiHBRdU (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2022 13:33:20 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com (mail-wr1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEB0D13D46; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 10:33:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id j1so10368540wrw.1; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 10:33:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc; bh=BavY1Tzh3YCu2l72D/MPQIKDEgSE7XBuJIIQTzol1a8=; b=NcYVkME75WTiHZrGD6J7ZPwGrfMc338IwgWqxn6lRvP/16iZUuehs05ZX0/Dywc2g9 c4WWfdmky5kvSK9hiWOnpOtyADjkOjrZpCNZ7KbUwg9JFVPxJ/+g/1tjf8WNiZVkHpRS BEF8bGDZanELpn+I1smNmuP1WL3mRBk+pcalv3YIJHDMz4/rxP60VDyk4zv2GoA68g/+ qFGwZEXoZczBDb9SB96wXdgUun7GyqZZY9j+fU/36MEe7ir+8SItuGSWnYs9APP5gpvm C1yf5Gjdr42MVpUChD5yGuos+V7RjRkKnGvlz3SakLsItbhmNxcpzW9J9hlfVPIFz8BK uS+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=BavY1Tzh3YCu2l72D/MPQIKDEgSE7XBuJIIQTzol1a8=; b=GnernW37dIn5lXHH/ivl5Tuvru897bZ4b6TgW12JTC6z1CC/aFwQS6d8xcRukWNCDi v8snoijCDXMruX44dqze4iJ2wZlU2MWP34PLDFu5mlScR+bSYcSDwb0wFz/iLXxsMYJL DSZfngk+hcLxTxraWyyxzlBrRFI7uRXLd5PtFzZAHtt7SgPIt9WAGq7t8Q7BO9Ve5Hvp mT8RfZCEfmZ0DFtCzX0skkGYytOwW4mwQ6tOp7RcEB2Jx3WV9raLlOK14Ldby+NV5jQ9 hXapGN0C9It2aDiTWXqicSRpp1bnreq8FN+d4w0nex4e9bwEcBqxy4U5vkgELJ6xY2+P UPIg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0W3gOWJB2OIuyUD/VG5WaJfsOoX80uX+GatTG6COfp9Xf0nAZB nJU2+g1jkqPUoDLNC/NJ4II= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR78wspfEPUXKLH4kYUzZ/8yXVlR8op2JuIYSxz6svA1DgoHCjzFVr7D9EHpZy6ShZhUeNXRGg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:d1c4:0:b0:220:78cc:5edd with SMTP id b4-20020adfd1c4000000b0022078cc5eddmr592513wrd.86.1659461597380; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 10:33:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian ([2405:201:8005:8149:e5c9:c0ac:4d82:e94b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q14-20020adff94e000000b0021d7b41255esm15540360wrr.98.2022.08.02.10.33.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 02 Aug 2022 10:33:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 18:33:05 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, slade@sladewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/65] 5.10.135-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20220801114133.641770326@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220801114133.641770326@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 01:46:17PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.135 release. > There are 65 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 03 Aug 2022 11:41:16 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20220724): mips: 63 configs -> no failure arm: 104 configs -> no failure arm64: 3 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1603 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1609 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip