All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] lib/stackdepot: Add a refcount field in stack_record
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 10:24:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YxBsWu36eqUw03Dy@elver.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220901044249.4624-2-osalvador@suse.de>

On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 06:42AM +0200, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> We want to filter out page_owner output and print only those
> stacks that have been repeated beyond a certain threshold.
> This gives us the chance to get rid of a lot of noise.
> In order to do that, we need to keep track of how many repeated stacks
> (for allocation) do we have, so we add a new refcount_t field
> in the stack_record struct.
> 
> Note that on __set_page_owner_handle(), page_owner->handle is set,
> and on __reset_page_owner(), page_owner->free_handle is set.
> 
> We are interested in page_owner->handle, so when __set_page_owner()
> gets called, we derive the stack_record struct from page_owner->handle,
> and we increment its refcount_t field; and when __reset_page_owner()
> gets called, we derive its stack_record from page_owner->handle()
> and we decrement its refcount_t field.
> 
> This is a preparation for patch#2.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
> ---
>  include/linux/stackdepot.h | 13 ++++++-
>  lib/stackdepot.c           | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  mm/kasan/common.c          |  3 +-

+Cc other kasan maintainers

>  mm/page_owner.c            | 13 +++++--
>  4 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/stackdepot.h b/include/linux/stackdepot.h
> index bc2797955de9..5ee0cf5be88f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/stackdepot.h
> +++ b/include/linux/stackdepot.h
> @@ -15,9 +15,16 @@
>  
>  typedef u32 depot_stack_handle_t;
>  
> +typedef enum stack_action {
> +	STACK_ACTION_NONE,
> +	STACK_ACTION_INC,
> +}stack_action_t;
> +

missing space after '}'. But please no unnecessary typedef, just 'enum
stack_action' (and spelling out 'enum stack_action' elsewhere) is just
fine.

This is in the global namespace, so I'd call this
stack_depot_action+STACK_DEPOT_ACTION_*.

However, .._ACTION_INC doesn't really say what's incremented. As an
analog to stack_depot_dec_count(), perhaps .._ACTION_COUNT?

In general it'd be nicer if there was stack_depot_inc_count() instead of
this additional argument, but I see that for performance reasons you
might not like that?

>  depot_stack_handle_t __stack_depot_save(unsigned long *entries,
>  					unsigned int nr_entries,
> -					gfp_t gfp_flags, bool can_alloc);
> +					gfp_t gfp_flags, bool can_alloc,
> +					stack_action_t action);
> +void stack_depot_dec_count(depot_stack_handle_t handle);
>  
>  /*
>   * Every user of stack depot has to call stack_depot_init() during its own init
> @@ -55,6 +62,10 @@ static inline int stack_depot_early_init(void)	{ return 0; }
>  
>  depot_stack_handle_t stack_depot_save(unsigned long *entries,
>  				      unsigned int nr_entries, gfp_t gfp_flags);
> +depot_stack_handle_t stack_depot_save_action(unsigned long *entries,
> +					     unsigned int nr_entries,
> +					     gfp_t gfp_flags,
> +					     stack_action_t action);
>  
>  unsigned int stack_depot_fetch(depot_stack_handle_t handle,
>  			       unsigned long **entries);
> diff --git a/lib/stackdepot.c b/lib/stackdepot.c
> index 5ca0d086ef4a..aeb59d3557e2 100644
> --- a/lib/stackdepot.c
> +++ b/lib/stackdepot.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ struct stack_record {
>  	u32 hash;			/* Hash in the hastable */
>  	u32 size;			/* Number of frames in the stack */
>  	union handle_parts handle;
> +	refcount_t count;		/* Number of the same repeated stacks */

This will increase stack_record size for every user, even if they don't
care about the count.

Is there a way to store this out-of-line somewhere?

>  	unsigned long entries[];	/* Variable-sized array of entries. */
>  };
>  
> @@ -139,6 +140,7 @@ depot_alloc_stack(unsigned long *entries, int size, u32 hash, void **prealloc)
>  	stack->handle.slabindex = depot_index;
>  	stack->handle.offset = depot_offset >> STACK_ALLOC_ALIGN;
>  	stack->handle.valid = 1;
> +	refcount_set(&stack->count, 1);
>  	memcpy(stack->entries, entries, flex_array_size(stack, entries, size));
>  	depot_offset += required_size;
>  
> @@ -302,6 +304,29 @@ void stack_depot_print(depot_stack_handle_t stack)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stack_depot_print);
>  
> +static struct stack_record *stack_depot_getstack(depot_stack_handle_t handle)
> +{
> +	union handle_parts parts = { .handle = handle };
> +	void *slab;
> +	size_t offset = parts.offset << STACK_ALLOC_ALIGN;
> +	struct stack_record *stack;
> +
> +	if(!handle)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	if (parts.slabindex > depot_index) {
> +		WARN(1, "slab index %d out of bounds (%d) for stack id %08x\n",
> +		     parts.slabindex, depot_index, handle);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +	slab = stack_slabs[parts.slabindex];
> +	if (!slab)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	stack = slab + offset;
> +	return stack;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * stack_depot_fetch - Fetch stack entries from a depot
>   *
> @@ -314,30 +339,42 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stack_depot_print);
>  unsigned int stack_depot_fetch(depot_stack_handle_t handle,
>  			       unsigned long **entries)
>  {
> -	union handle_parts parts = { .handle = handle };
> -	void *slab;
> -	size_t offset = parts.offset << STACK_ALLOC_ALIGN;
>  	struct stack_record *stack;
>  
>  	*entries = NULL;
>  	if (!handle)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	if (parts.slabindex > depot_index) {
> -		WARN(1, "slab index %d out of bounds (%d) for stack id %08x\n",
> -			parts.slabindex, depot_index, handle);
> -		return 0;
> -	}
> -	slab = stack_slabs[parts.slabindex];
> -	if (!slab)
> +	stack = stack_depot_getstack(handle);
> +	if (!stack)
>  		return 0;
> -	stack = slab + offset;
>  
>  	*entries = stack->entries;
>  	return stack->size;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stack_depot_fetch);
>  
> +static void stack_depot_inc_count(struct stack_record *stack)
> +{
> +	refcount_inc(&stack->count);
> +}
> +
> +void stack_depot_dec_count(depot_stack_handle_t handle)
> +{
> +	struct stack_record *stack = NULL;
> +
> +	stack = stack_depot_getstack(handle);
> +	if (stack) {
> +	/*
> +	 * page_owner creates some stacks via create_dummy_stack().
> +	 * We are not interested in those, so make sure we only decrement
> +	 * "valid" stacks.
> +	 */

Comment indent is wrong.

> +		if (refcount_read(&stack->count) > 1)
> +			refcount_dec(&stack->count);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * __stack_depot_save - Save a stack trace from an array
>   *
> @@ -363,7 +400,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stack_depot_fetch);
>   */
>  depot_stack_handle_t __stack_depot_save(unsigned long *entries,
>  					unsigned int nr_entries,
> -					gfp_t alloc_flags, bool can_alloc)
> +					gfp_t alloc_flags, bool can_alloc,
> +					stack_action_t action)
>  {
>  	struct stack_record *found = NULL, **bucket;
>  	depot_stack_handle_t retval = 0;
> @@ -449,8 +487,11 @@ depot_stack_handle_t __stack_depot_save(unsigned long *entries,
>  		/* Nobody used this memory, ok to free it. */
>  		free_pages((unsigned long)prealloc, STACK_ALLOC_ORDER);
>  	}
> -	if (found)
> +	if (found) {
>  		retval = found->handle.handle;
> +		if (action == STACK_ACTION_INC)
> +			stack_depot_inc_count(found);
> +	}
>  fast_exit:
>  	return retval;
>  }
> @@ -472,6 +513,16 @@ depot_stack_handle_t stack_depot_save(unsigned long *entries,
>  				      unsigned int nr_entries,
>  				      gfp_t alloc_flags)
>  {
> -	return __stack_depot_save(entries, nr_entries, alloc_flags, true);
> +	return __stack_depot_save(entries, nr_entries, alloc_flags, true,
> +				  STACK_ACTION_NONE);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stack_depot_save);
> +
> +depot_stack_handle_t stack_depot_save_action(unsigned long *entries,
> +					     unsigned int nr_entries,
> +					     gfp_t alloc_flags,
> +					     stack_action_t action)
> +{
> +	return __stack_depot_save(entries, nr_entries, alloc_flags, true, action);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stack_depot_save_action);
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/common.c b/mm/kasan/common.c
> index c40c0e7b3b5f..f434994f3b0d 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/common.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/common.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,8 @@ depot_stack_handle_t kasan_save_stack(gfp_t flags, bool can_alloc)
>  	unsigned int nr_entries;
>  
>  	nr_entries = stack_trace_save(entries, ARRAY_SIZE(entries), 0);
> -	return __stack_depot_save(entries, nr_entries, flags, can_alloc);
> +	return __stack_depot_save(entries, nr_entries, flags, can_alloc,
> +				  STACK_ACTION_NONE);
>  }
>  
>  void kasan_set_track(struct kasan_track *track, gfp_t flags)
> diff --git a/mm/page_owner.c b/mm/page_owner.c
> index e4c6f3f1695b..794f346d7520 100644
> --- a/mm/page_owner.c
> +++ b/mm/page_owner.c
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static inline struct page_owner *get_page_owner(struct page_ext *page_ext)
>  	return (void *)page_ext + page_owner_ops.offset;
>  }
>  
> -static noinline depot_stack_handle_t save_stack(gfp_t flags)
> +static noinline depot_stack_handle_t save_stack(gfp_t flags, stack_action_t action)
>  {
>  	unsigned long entries[PAGE_OWNER_STACK_DEPTH];
>  	depot_stack_handle_t handle;
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static noinline depot_stack_handle_t save_stack(gfp_t flags)
>  	current->in_page_owner = 1;
>  
>  	nr_entries = stack_trace_save(entries, ARRAY_SIZE(entries), 2);
> -	handle = stack_depot_save(entries, nr_entries, flags);
> +	handle = stack_depot_save_action(entries, nr_entries, flags, action);
>  	if (!handle)
>  		handle = failure_handle;
>  
> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ void __reset_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned short order)
>  	int i;
>  	struct page_ext *page_ext;
>  	depot_stack_handle_t handle;
> +	depot_stack_handle_t alloc_handle;
>  	struct page_owner *page_owner;
>  	u64 free_ts_nsec = local_clock();
>  
> @@ -145,7 +146,10 @@ void __reset_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned short order)
>  	if (unlikely(!page_ext))
>  		return;
>  
> -	handle = save_stack(GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN);
> +	page_owner = get_page_owner(page_ext);
> +	alloc_handle = page_owner->handle;
> +
> +	handle = save_stack(GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN, STACK_ACTION_NONE);
>  	for (i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++) {
>  		__clear_bit(PAGE_EXT_OWNER_ALLOCATED, &page_ext->flags);
>  		page_owner = get_page_owner(page_ext);
> @@ -153,6 +157,7 @@ void __reset_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned short order)
>  		page_owner->free_ts_nsec = free_ts_nsec;
>  		page_ext = page_ext_next(page_ext);
>  	}
> +	stack_depot_dec_count(alloc_handle);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void __set_page_owner_handle(struct page_ext *page_ext,
> @@ -189,7 +194,7 @@ noinline void __set_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned short order,
>  	if (unlikely(!page_ext))
>  		return;
>  
> -	handle = save_stack(gfp_mask);
> +	handle = save_stack(gfp_mask, STACK_ACTION_INC);
>  	__set_page_owner_handle(page_ext, handle, order, gfp_mask);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.35.3

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-01  8:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-01  4:42 [PATCH 0/3] page_owner: print stacks and their counter Oscar Salvador
2022-09-01  4:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] lib/stackdepot: Add a refcount field in stack_record Oscar Salvador
2022-09-01  8:24   ` Marco Elver [this message]
2022-09-01  8:38     ` Michal Hocko
2022-09-01  9:18       ` Marco Elver
2022-09-01 10:01         ` Michal Hocko
2022-09-01 10:20           ` Marco Elver
2022-09-05 20:53         ` Andrey Konovalov
2022-09-02  3:27     ` Oscar Salvador
2022-09-01  4:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm, page_owner: Add page_owner_stacks file to print out only stacks and their counter Oscar Salvador
2022-09-01  8:16   ` Ammar Faizi
2022-09-02  3:33     ` Oscar Salvador
2022-09-01 19:29   ` kernel test robot
2022-09-02  0:56   ` kernel test robot
2022-09-01  4:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm,page_owner: Filter out stacks by a threshold counter Oscar Salvador
2022-09-01  8:31   ` Ammar Faizi
2022-09-02  3:36     ` Oscar Salvador
2022-09-01  8:40   ` Michal Hocko
2022-09-02  3:37     ` Oscar Salvador
2022-09-01  8:32 ` [PATCH 0/3] page_owner: print stacks and their counter Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YxBsWu36eqUw03Dy@elver.google.com \
    --to=elver@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.