On Sat, 28 Jan 2023, Markus Elfring wrote:

> > @@
> > identifier nested_macros.nm;
> > function f;
> > identifier dev_priv;
>
>
> How do you think about to use the following SmPL code variant instead of
> the metavariable type “function”?
>
>
> identifier dev_priv, f;

Good suggestion,  Function is not really supported.  I think it behaves
just like identifier, but it would be better to just use identifier.
Function was an idea thta never actually got implemented.

julia

>
>
>
> > expression e;
> > @@
> > f(...) {
> > 	...
> > -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = e;
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = e;
> >
> > 	<+...nm(...)...+>
> > }
>
> Regards,
> Markus
>