All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian König" <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
To: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@amd.com>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Likun.Gao@amd.com,
	christian.koenig@amd.com, Hawking.Zhang@amd.com,
	alexander.deucher@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: avoid over-handle of fence driver fini in s3 test (v2)
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 08:56:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7218d98-9eb1-2d41-157a-bc417ef496ab@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210802051602.23822-1-guchun.chen@amd.com>

Am 02.08.21 um 07:16 schrieb Guchun Chen:
> In amdgpu_fence_driver_hw_fini, no need to call drm_sched_fini to stop
> scheduler in s3 test, otherwise, fence related failure will arrive
> after resume. To fix this and for a better clean up, move drm_sched_fini
> from fence_hw_fini to fence_sw_fini, as it's part of driver shutdown, and
> should never be called in hw_fini.
>
> v2: rename amdgpu_fence_driver_init to amdgpu_fence_driver_sw_init,
> to keep sw_init and sw_fini paired.
>
> Fixes: cd87a6dcf6af drm/amdgpu: adjust fence driver enable sequence
> Suggested-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@amd.com>

It's a bit ambiguous now what fence_drv.initialized means, but I think 
we can live with that for now.

Patch is Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>.

Regards,
Christian.

> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c |  5 ++---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c  | 12 +++++++-----
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h   |  4 ++--
>   3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> index b1d2dc39e8be..9e53ff851496 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> @@ -3646,9 +3646,9 @@ int amdgpu_device_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>   
>   fence_driver_init:
>   	/* Fence driver */
> -	r = amdgpu_fence_driver_init(adev);
> +	r = amdgpu_fence_driver_sw_init(adev);
>   	if (r) {
> -		dev_err(adev->dev, "amdgpu_fence_driver_init failed\n");
> +		dev_err(adev->dev, "amdgpu_fence_driver_sw_init failed\n");
>   		amdgpu_vf_error_put(adev, AMDGIM_ERROR_VF_FENCE_INIT_FAIL, 0, 0);
>   		goto failed;
>   	}
> @@ -3988,7 +3988,6 @@ int amdgpu_device_resume(struct drm_device *dev, bool fbcon)
>   	}
>   	amdgpu_fence_driver_hw_init(adev);
>   
> -
>   	r = amdgpu_device_ip_late_init(adev);
>   	if (r)
>   		return r;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
> index 49c5c7331c53..7495911516c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
> @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ int amdgpu_fence_driver_init_ring(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
>   }
>   
>   /**
> - * amdgpu_fence_driver_init - init the fence driver
> + * amdgpu_fence_driver_sw_init - init the fence driver
>    * for all possible rings.
>    *
>    * @adev: amdgpu device pointer
> @@ -509,13 +509,13 @@ int amdgpu_fence_driver_init_ring(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
>    * amdgpu_fence_driver_start_ring().
>    * Returns 0 for success.
>    */
> -int amdgpu_fence_driver_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> +int amdgpu_fence_driver_sw_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>   {
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
>   /**
> - * amdgpu_fence_driver_fini - tear down the fence driver
> + * amdgpu_fence_driver_hw_fini - tear down the fence driver
>    * for all possible rings.
>    *
>    * @adev: amdgpu device pointer
> @@ -531,8 +531,7 @@ void amdgpu_fence_driver_hw_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>   
>   		if (!ring || !ring->fence_drv.initialized)
>   			continue;
> -		if (!ring->no_scheduler)
> -			drm_sched_fini(&ring->sched);
> +
>   		/* You can't wait for HW to signal if it's gone */
>   		if (!drm_dev_is_unplugged(&adev->ddev))
>   			r = amdgpu_fence_wait_empty(ring);
> @@ -560,6 +559,9 @@ void amdgpu_fence_driver_sw_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>   		if (!ring || !ring->fence_drv.initialized)
>   			continue;
>   
> +		if (!ring->no_scheduler)
> +			drm_sched_fini(&ring->sched);
> +
>   		for (j = 0; j <= ring->fence_drv.num_fences_mask; ++j)
>   			dma_fence_put(ring->fence_drv.fences[j]);
>   		kfree(ring->fence_drv.fences);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
> index 27adffa7658d..9c11ced4312c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
> @@ -106,7 +106,6 @@ struct amdgpu_fence_driver {
>   	struct dma_fence		**fences;
>   };
>   
> -int amdgpu_fence_driver_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
>   void amdgpu_fence_driver_force_completion(struct amdgpu_ring *ring);
>   
>   int amdgpu_fence_driver_init_ring(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
> @@ -115,9 +114,10 @@ int amdgpu_fence_driver_init_ring(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
>   int amdgpu_fence_driver_start_ring(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
>   				   struct amdgpu_irq_src *irq_src,
>   				   unsigned irq_type);
> +void amdgpu_fence_driver_hw_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
>   void amdgpu_fence_driver_hw_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
> +int amdgpu_fence_driver_sw_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
>   void amdgpu_fence_driver_sw_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
> -void amdgpu_fence_driver_hw_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
>   int amdgpu_fence_emit(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, struct dma_fence **fence,
>   		      unsigned flags);
>   int amdgpu_fence_emit_polling(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, uint32_t *s,


  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-02  6:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-02  5:16 [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: avoid over-handle of fence driver fini in s3 test (v2) Guchun Chen
2021-08-02  6:56 ` Christian König [this message]
2021-08-02  8:23   ` Chen, Guchun
2021-08-02 13:35     ` Alex Deucher
2021-08-02 16:19       ` Mike Lothian
2021-08-03  1:56       ` Chen, Guchun
2021-08-18  2:08         ` Mike Lothian
2021-08-18  2:12           ` Mike Lothian
2021-08-18  2:23             ` Chen, Guchun
2021-08-18  8:13               ` Mike Lothian
2021-08-18  5:26 ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2021-08-19 12:04   ` Mike Lothian
2021-08-19 18:13     ` Alex Deucher
2021-08-23  6:36       ` Chen, Guchun
2021-08-23  6:50         ` Christian König
2021-08-23 14:41           ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2021-08-27 10:42             ` Chen, Guchun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b7218d98-9eb1-2d41-157a-bc417ef496ab@gmail.com \
    --to=ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com \
    --cc=Hawking.Zhang@amd.com \
    --cc=Likun.Gao@amd.com \
    --cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=guchun.chen@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.