From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revert and rework on the metadata accelreation Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 15:18:01 +0800 Message-ID: References: <20190905122736.19768-1-jasowang@redhat.com> <20190905135907.GB6011@mellanox.com> <7785d39b-b4e7-8165-516c-ee6a08ac9c4e@redhat.com> <20190906.151505.1486178691190611604.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190906.151505.1486178691190611604.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: David Miller Cc: aarcange@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, jglisse@redhat.com, jgg@mellanox.com List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On 2019/9/6 下午9:15, David Miller wrote: > From: Jason Wang > Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 18:02:35 +0800 > >> On 2019/9/5 下午9:59, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >>> I think you should apply the revert this cycle and rebase the other >>> patch for next.. >>> >>> Jason >> Yes, the plan is to revert in this release cycle. > Then you should reset patch #1 all by itself targetting 'net'. Thanks for the reminding. I want the patch to go through Michael's vhost tree, that's why I don't put 'net' prefix. For next time, maybe I can use "vhost" as a prefix for classification?