https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106928

--- Comment #15 from ubizjak@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Dave Airlie from comment #14)
> I think Roland's first patch is correct, just call fold_alu_op2 if we get
> back 2 sources from fold_assoc. return true is for when we've finished all
> folding on that instruction, so I don't think that's correct without calling
> fold_alu_op2

LGTM then (it also fixes the failure for me), but can we please drop the "else"
from the patch, it is really confusing.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.