All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>, io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-5.10] io_uring: remove req cancel in ->flush()
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:08:25 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca4c9b80-78de-eae2-55cf-8d7c3f09ca80@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21aca47e03c82a06e4ea1140b328a86d04d1f422.1603122023.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>

On 10/19/20 9:45 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Every close(io_uring) causes cancellation of all inflight requests
> carrying ->files. That's not nice but was neccessary up until recently.
> Now task->files removal is handled in the core code, so that part of
> flush can be removed.

It does change the behavior, but I'd wager that's safe. One minor
comment:

> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index 95d2bb7069c6..6536e24eb44e 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -8748,16 +8748,12 @@ void __io_uring_task_cancel(void)
>  
>  static int io_uring_flush(struct file *file, void *data)
>  {
> -	struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = file->private_data;
> +	bool exiting = !data;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * If the task is going away, cancel work it may have pending
> -	 */
>  	if (fatal_signal_pending(current) || (current->flags & PF_EXITING))
> -		data = NULL;
> +		exiting = true;
>  
> -	io_uring_cancel_task_requests(ctx, data);
> -	io_uring_attempt_task_drop(file, !data);
> +	io_uring_attempt_task_drop(file, exiting);
>  	return 0;
>  }

Why not just keep the !data for task_drop? Would make the diff take
away just the hunk we're interested in. Even adding a comment would be
better, imho.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-19 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-19 15:45 [PATCH for-5.10] io_uring: remove req cancel in ->flush() Pavel Begunkov
2020-10-19 20:08 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2020-10-19 23:40   ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-10-20 14:09     ` Jens Axboe
2020-10-20 16:29       ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-10-20 16:59         ` Jens Axboe
2020-10-22  6:42 ` Xiaoguang Wang
2020-10-22 11:44   ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-10-23  3:33     ` Xiaoguang Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ca4c9b80-78de-eae2-55cf-8d7c3f09ca80@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.