From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from m12-13.163.com ([220.181.12.13]:49338 "EHLO m12-13.163.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727753AbeIFOuQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2018 10:50:16 -0400 Subject: Re: Affinity managed interrupts vs non-managed interrupts To: Thomas Gleixner , Kashyap Desai Cc: Ming Lei , Sumit Saxena , Ming Lei , Christoph Hellwig , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Shivasharan Srikanteshwara , linux-block , Dou Liyang References: <20180829084618.GA24765@ming.t460p> <300d6fef733ca76ced581f8c6304bac6@mail.gmail.com> <615d78004495aebc53807156d04d988c@mail.gmail.com> <486f94a563d63c4779498fe8829a546c@mail.gmail.com> <602cee6381b9f435a938bbaf852d07f9@mail.gmail.com> <66256272c020be186becdd7a3f049302@mail.gmail.com> From: Dou Liyang Message-ID: Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 18:14:50 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gbk; format=flowed Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Hi Thomas, At 09/05/2018 06:38 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Oh well. This was not intended to magically provide the solution you want > to have. It merily changed the behaviour of the managed interrupt > selection, which is a valid thing to do independent of the stuff you want > to see. > Thank you for clarifying it, I will send the patch independently. > As I said that needs more thought and I really can't tell when I have a > time slot to look at that. > In this period, I am willing to be a volunteer to try to do that you said in the previous reply. May I? Thanks dou From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7526EC433F5 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 10:15:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD4D2075B for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 10:15:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b="kbCgnzq8" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1DD4D2075B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728353AbeIFOuQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2018 10:50:16 -0400 Received: from m12-13.163.com ([220.181.12.13]:49338 "EHLO m12-13.163.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727753AbeIFOuQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2018 10:50:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=Subject:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version; bh=q+E43 1o3NMLjxkTMQ6dbM95VNMH3rFUn+KLt95/vyag=; b=kbCgnzq88dSWjQRUHuyfM FiNXOWAlbOeL6RQK29Xof30tm9gzJqYWcwgBW4Gx9ygKIsWuvGFesD6AeiFwGUUG u23gpAAJIxUeysknAoHGlwkqFnQ67p9JxWjHIgW0gCdGDD16AJwUWc+9oncVjsOW Mix+LXEfITL+/HdZ6+ZZBg= Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [49.65.59.196]) by smtp9 (Coremail) with SMTP id DcCowADHSX4a_pBbMYdbIg--.61270S2; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 18:14:51 +0800 (CST) Subject: Re: Affinity managed interrupts vs non-managed interrupts To: Thomas Gleixner , Kashyap Desai Cc: Ming Lei , Sumit Saxena , Ming Lei , Christoph Hellwig , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Shivasharan Srikanteshwara , linux-block , Dou Liyang References: <20180829084618.GA24765@ming.t460p> <300d6fef733ca76ced581f8c6304bac6@mail.gmail.com> <615d78004495aebc53807156d04d988c@mail.gmail.com> <486f94a563d63c4779498fe8829a546c@mail.gmail.com> <602cee6381b9f435a938bbaf852d07f9@mail.gmail.com> <66256272c020be186becdd7a3f049302@mail.gmail.com> From: Dou Liyang Message-ID: Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 18:14:50 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gbk; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CM-TRANSID: DcCowADHSX4a_pBbMYdbIg--.61270S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxUDEfOUUUUU X-Originating-IP: [49.65.59.196] X-CM-SenderInfo: pgrxszxl1d0wi6rwjhhfrp/1tbiOQ64olXlg2nwawABst Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Thomas, At 09/05/2018 06:38 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Oh well. This was not intended to magically provide the solution you want > to have. It merily changed the behaviour of the managed interrupt > selection, which is a valid thing to do independent of the stuff you want > to see. > Thank you for clarifying it, I will send the patch independently. > As I said that needs more thought and I really can't tell when I have a > time slot to look at that. > In this period, I am willing to be a volunteer to try to do that you said in the previous reply. May I? Thanks dou