[LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] sigpending/rt_sigpending: add basic test

[Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>]

Hi Matthias I had a couple minor comments,

On 03/13/2019 05:02 AM, 'Matthias Maennich' via kernel-team wrote:
> Test basic functionality of sigpending/rt_sigpending.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Maennich <maennich@google.com>
> ---
>   .../kernel/syscalls/sigpending/sigpending02.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sigpending/sigpending02.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sigpending/sigpending02.c
> index cc50870b107a..e75c6aa69c4c 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sigpending/sigpending02.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sigpending/sigpending02.c
> @@ -4,14 +4,18 @@
>    *
>    * AUTHORS
>    *	Paul Larson
> + *	Matthias Maennich
>    *
>    * DESCRIPTION
> - *	Test to see that the proper errors are returned by sigpending. All the
> - *	tests can also be compiled to use the rt_sigpending syscall instead. To
> - *	simplify the documentation, only sigpending() is usually mentioned
> - *	below.
> + *	Test to assert basic functionality of sigpending. All the tests can also be
> + *	compiled to use the rt_sigpending syscall instead. To simplify the
> + *	documentation, only sigpending() is usually mentioned below.
>    *
>    *	Test 1:
> + *		Suppress handling SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR1, raise them and assert their
> + *		signal pending.
> + *
> + *	Test 2:
>    *		Call sigpending(sigset_t*=-1), it should return -1 with errno EFAULT
>    */
>   
> @@ -23,19 +27,101 @@
>   #include "ltp_signal.h"
>   #include "lapi/syscalls.h"
>   
> -static void run(void)
> -{
> -	/* set sigset to point to an invalid location */
> -	sigset_t *sigset = (sigset_t *) - 1;
> +#define min(x, y) (((x) < (y)) ? (x) : (y))
>   
>   #if defined(TEST_SIGPENDING)
> -	TEST(tst_syscall(__NR_sigpending, sigset));
> +#define tested_sigpending(sigset) TEST(tst_syscall(__NR_sigpending, sigset))
>   #elif defined(TEST_RT_SIGPENDING)
> -	TEST(tst_syscall(__NR_rt_sigpending, sigset, SIGSETSIZE));
> +#define tested_sigpending(sigset)                                              \
> +	TEST(tst_syscall(__NR_rt_sigpending, sigset, SIGSETSIZE))
>   #else
>   #error Neither TEST_SIGPENDING nor TEST_RT_SIGPENDING is defined!
>   #endif
>   
> +static int sighandler_counter = 0;
> +static void sighandler(int signum)
> +{
> +	(void)signum;

You can use LTP_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED on signum to avoid the above statement

> +	++sighandler_counter;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_sigpending(void)
> +{
> +	int SIGMAX = min(sizeof(sigset_t) * 8, _NSIG);
> +
> +	// set up signal mask and handler

AFAIK /* */ comments are preferred in new LTP commits.

> +	sigset_t only_SIGUSR, old_mask;
> +	sighandler_t old_sighandler1, old_sighandler2;
> +	sigemptyset(&only_SIGUSR);
> +	sigaddset(&only_SIGUSR, SIGUSR1);
> +	sigaddset(&only_SIGUSR, SIGUSR2);
> +	if (sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &only_SIGUSR, &old_mask))
> +		tst_brk(TBROK, "sigprocmask failed");
> +	old_sighandler1 = SAFE_SIGNAL(SIGUSR1, sighandler);
> +	old_sighandler2 = SAFE_SIGNAL(SIGUSR2, sighandler);
> +
> +	// Initially no signal should be pending
> +	sigset_t pending;
> +	sigemptyset(&pending);
> +	tested_sigpending(&pending);
> +
> +	for (int i = 1; i < SIGMAX; ++i)
> +		if (sigismember(&pending, i))
> +			tst_brk(TFAIL,
> +				"initialization failed: no signal should be pending by now");
> +
> +	// raise a signal
> +	if (raise(SIGUSR1))
> +		tst_brk(TBROK, "raising SIGUSR1 failed");
> +	if (sighandler_counter > 0)
> +		tst_brk(TFAIL,
> +			"signal handler is not (yet) supposed to be called");
> +
> +	// now we should have exactly one pending signal (SIGUSR1)
> +	sigemptyset(&pending);
> +	tested_sigpending(&pending);
> +	for (int i = 1; i < SIGMAX; ++i)
> +		if ((i == SIGUSR1) != sigismember(&pending, i))
> +			tst_brk(TFAIL, "only SIGUSR1 should be pending by now");
> +
> +	// raise another signal
> +	if (raise(SIGUSR2))
> +		tst_brk(TBROK, "raising SIGUSR2 failed");
> +	if (sighandler_counter > 0)
> +		tst_brk(TFAIL,
> +			"signal handler is not (yet) supposed to be called");
> +
> +	// now we should have exactly two pending signals (SIGUSR1, SIGUSR2)
> +	sigemptyset(&pending);
> +	tested_sigpending(&pending);
> +	for (int i = 1; i < SIGMAX; ++i)
> +		if ((i == SIGUSR1 || i == SIGUSR2) != sigismember(&pending, i))
> +			tst_brk(TFAIL,
> +				"only SIGUSR1, SIGUSR2 should be pending by now");
> +
> +	tst_res(TPASS, "basic sigpending test successful");
> +
> +	// reinstate old mask
> +	if (sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &old_mask, NULL))
> +		tst_brk(TBROK, "sigprocmask failed");
> +
> +	// at this time the signal handler has been called, once for each signal
> +	if (sighandler_counter != 2)
> +		tst_brk(TFAIL,
> +			"signal handler has not been called for each signal");
> +
> +	// reinstate the original signal handlers
> +	SAFE_SIGNAL(SIGUSR1, old_sighandler1);
> +	SAFE_SIGNAL(SIGUSR2, old_sighandler2);
> +}
> +
> +static void test_efault_on_invalid_sigset(void)
> +{
> +	/* set sigset to point to an invalid location */
> +	sigset_t *sigset = (sigset_t *)-1;
> +
> +	tested_sigpending(sigset);
> +
>   	/* check return code */
>   	if (TST_RET == -1) {
>   		if (TST_ERR != EFAULT) {
> @@ -51,6 +137,12 @@ static void run(void)
>   	}
>   }
>   
> +static void run(void)
> +{
> +	test_sigpending();
> +	test_efault_on_invalid_sigset();
> +}
> +
>   static struct tst_test test = {
>   	.test_all = run
>   };
>