All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] gcov: add basic gcov_info validation to gcov initialization
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 11:59:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f0148fb8-1779-a18e-315c-87df31d3154f@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210602102455.11724-1-lhenriques@suse.de>

On 02.06.2021 12:24, Luis Henriques wrote:
> Add a basic gcov_info struct validation helper to gcc to ensure we have
> sane from the compiler.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
> ---
> Hi!
> 
> I know this won't really validate the gcov_info struct, but it will at
> least prevent kernel crashes in simple scenarios (such as the one I'm
> seeing with gcc 9.3.1).

Thanks for your suggestion of adding validity checking for the gcov_info
struct. The goal you aim at is definitely something that we want to have
to reduce the impact of fallout from changes to GCC's gcov_info struct.

In my opinion though the approach you described - looking at the
contents of specific fields in gcov_info - isn't the correct way to go
forward. Since you cannot know how gcov_info changed, accessing any data
in it is very dangerous. Even if there's no out-of-bounds access (if the
struct's size was reduced) the field you are checking could have moved
elsewhere so the meaningfulness of the check is very limited.

In a previous discussion on the same topic I proposed a different
approach for a build-time check that would fully check the compatibility
of kernel code and GCC-emitted gcov-related data structures. See:

https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1393585/#1592411

Unfortunately I have not yet found the time to implement this approach
but it's still on my to-do-list.

Regarding the cause of the error you're seeing I'll have a look at the
corresponding GCC source to see if there's anything that could be
causing the issue.


Regards,
  Peter Oberparleiter

-- 
Peter Oberparleiter
Linux on Z Development - IBM Germany

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-07  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-01 15:56 gcov: NULL pointer dereference with gcc 9.3.1 Luis Henriques
2021-06-02 10:24 ` [RFC PATCH] gcov: add basic gcov_info validation to gcov initialization Luis Henriques
2021-06-07  9:59   ` Peter Oberparleiter [this message]
2021-06-07 10:48     ` Luis Henriques
2021-06-02 12:35 ` gcov: NULL pointer dereference with gcc 9.3.1 Peter Oberparleiter
2021-06-02 14:22   ` Luis Henriques
2021-06-07 14:32     ` Peter Oberparleiter
2021-06-08 12:46       ` Luis Henriques

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f0148fb8-1779-a18e-315c-87df31d3154f@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=lhenriques@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.