"Zawadzki, Tomasz" writes: > Hi Lincoln, > > > > That patch in question is now merged to branch v21.01.x. > Good to know - I do still see a failure in the IOL job (even from a few hours ago). I suppose the lab side might need some adjustment, too? > > The builds performed for latest SPDK and SPDK LTS, against dpdk-main branch seem to be passing. Would love to hear if > this is what you are seeing on your end too. > > > > Thanks, > > Tomek > > > > From: Lincoln Lavoie > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 5:21 PM > To: Zawadzki, Tomasz > Cc: Aaron Conole ; Brandon Lo ; dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; ci@dpdk.org; > dev@dpdk.org; spdk@lists.01.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab > > > > Thanks Tomek, > > > > Can you let us know when the merge happens and we'll make sure the next set of builds pass or see what the next failure > is. :-P > > > > Cheers, > Lincoln > > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:03 AM Zawadzki, Tomasz wrote: > > Hi Aaron, > > Thank you for reporting this ! > > This is an issue with rte_power now depending on rte_ethdev, which was resolved on latest SPDK. > > I believe that UNH lab verifies DPDK patches against SPDK branch for latest release. Which after the very recent SPDK > release, would be v21.01.x: > https://github.com/spdk/spdk/tree/v21.01.x > > The fix has been backported to that branch and should be merged shortly: > https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/6320 > > Thanks, > Tomek > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev On Behalf Of Aaron Conole > > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 4:21 PM > > To: Brandon Lo > > Cc: dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; ci@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org; spdk@lists.01.org > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab > > > > Greetings, > > > > I've noticed that recently SPDK compilation in the UNH community lab seems > > to be failing, and I don't see an obvious reason for the failure. > > The logs haven't been too helpful - it appears that there is a symbol that isn't > > available when linking. > > > > Job details (for example): > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/results/results- > > uploads/test_runs/2363efb43157465db3228c34c00ebd57/log_upload_file/20 > > 21/2/dpdk_f6f2d2240153_15524_2021-02-04_22-59-59_NA.zip > > > > Is it possible to turn on more verbose logging during the compilation of > > SPDK? Maybe show the arguments to the compiler for the specific object? > > Maybe the SPDK folks can see something obviously wrong? > > > > Thanks, > > -Aaron