All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86: suppress XPTI-related TLB flushes when possible
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 19:52:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa4956c6-97b6-ecb4-740e-5162347526fc@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5C88F9B0020000780021E177@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com>

On 13/03/2019 12:38, Jan Beulich wrote:
> When there's no XPTI-enabled PV domain at all, there's no need to issue
> respective TLB flushes. Hardwire opt_xpti_* to false when !PV, and
> record the creation of PV domains by bumping opt_xpti_* accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> ---
> TBD: The hardwiring to false could be extended to opt_pv_l1tf_* and (for
>      !HVM) opt_l1d_flush as well.

For what purpose?  opt_pv_l1tf_* is only read inside a CONFIG_PV section
(despite how pv_l1tf_domain_init() is laid out - there is an outer ifdef
as well), while opt_l1d_flush influences the contents of the guests MSR
load list, which is inherently VT-x only.

> --- a/xen/arch/x86/pv/domain.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/pv/domain.c
> @@ -270,6 +270,9 @@ void pv_domain_destroy(struct domain *d)
>      destroy_perdomain_mapping(d, GDT_LDT_VIRT_START,
>                                GDT_LDT_MBYTES << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT));
>  
> +    opt_xpti_hwdom -= IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LATE_HWDOM) &&
> +                      !d->domain_id && opt_xpti_hwdom;
> +
>      XFREE(d->arch.pv.cpuidmasks);
>  
>      FREE_XENHEAP_PAGE(d->arch.pv.gdt_ldt_l1tab);
> @@ -308,7 +311,16 @@ int pv_domain_initialise(struct domain *
>      /* 64-bit PV guest by default. */
>      d->arch.is_32bit_pv = d->arch.has_32bit_shinfo = 0;
>  
> -    d->arch.pv.xpti = is_hardware_domain(d) ? opt_xpti_hwdom : opt_xpti_domu;
> +    if ( is_hardware_domain(d) && opt_xpti_hwdom )
> +    {
> +        d->arch.pv.xpti = true;
> +        ++opt_xpti_hwdom;
> +    }
> +    if ( !is_hardware_domain(d) && opt_xpti_domu )
> +    {
> +        d->arch.pv.xpti = true;
> +        opt_xpti_domu = 2;

This logic is asymetric.  We will retain TLB flushing after the final
domu has shut down.

I'm also not sure about the hwdom logic.  There is guaranteed to be
exactly one, and Xen will shut down when it goes offline, but it may not
be a PV guest.  opt_xpti_hwdom should be unconditionally 2 on this path
(I think).

> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/spec_ctrl.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/spec_ctrl.h
> @@ -42,7 +42,12 @@ extern bool bsp_delay_spec_ctrl;
>  extern uint8_t default_xen_spec_ctrl;
>  extern uint8_t default_spec_ctrl_flags;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PV
>  extern int8_t opt_xpti_hwdom, opt_xpti_domu;
> +#else
> +# define opt_xpti_hwdom false
> +# define opt_xpti_domu false
> +#endif

These now have more complicated interaction with flushing.  At the
absolute minimum, it needs a sentence or two about the new semantics.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-03 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-13 12:18 [PATCH 0/4] x86: some further follow-up to recent XSAs Jan Beulich
2019-03-13 12:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86: suppress XPTI-related TLB flushes when possible Jan Beulich
2019-04-03 18:52   ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2019-04-04 10:07     ` Jan Beulich
2019-03-13 12:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86: relax a few get_gfn() invocations Jan Beulich
2019-04-03 18:16   ` Andrew Cooper
2019-04-05 10:30   ` George Dunlap
2019-04-05 10:30     ` [Xen-devel] " George Dunlap
2019-04-05 10:52     ` Jan Beulich
2019-04-05 10:52       ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2019-03-13 12:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86/mm: drop redundant local variable from _get_page_type() Jan Beulich
2019-04-03 18:17   ` Andrew Cooper
2019-04-05 10:37   ` George Dunlap
2019-04-05 10:37     ` [Xen-devel] " George Dunlap
2019-03-13 12:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/PV: remove unnecessary toggle_guest_pt() overhead Jan Beulich
2019-04-03 18:32   ` Andrew Cooper
2019-04-04  9:42     ` Jan Beulich
     [not found]   ` <5C88F9F30200000000104057@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com>
     [not found]     ` <5C88F9F3020000780023294C@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com>
2019-05-27  9:25       ` Ping: " Jan Beulich
2019-05-27  9:25         ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fa4956c6-97b6-ecb4-740e-5162347526fc@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.