From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D433C4727C for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 15:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19CFC208B6 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 15:13:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="vaghxvQp" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732407AbgJAPNT (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 11:13:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36456 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732384AbgJAPNT (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 11:13:19 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x442.google.com (mail-wr1-x442.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::442]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 148ADC0613D0 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 08:13:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x442.google.com with SMTP id e16so6244970wrm.2 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 08:13:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bmuG9CC00/55KT9qwZ18d1AlXtMNmB8K4AK4SMyixiU=; b=vaghxvQpM2CEp8GWIB3cMIIqmE+/M1hH8PWNX0tRPiNY4FYdfsZs3HuaXjk8WbHpTD 9xCnvNUTLR0yF4u74F6vOEcqUUteYpKLpE/yCysZyFsaZJ8SVNFY+Jrg4uzzoTN2vHI0 TPHWEZKOMbWnoJZ4V+8hqnN889ldpLe+5vciPGykDKgQUJgLJ0ckaiEpPfaKBio3HGDd epmehg/uogtPz3WmNh+EtkkeaOg5CZN93VzKivcvCemi8RI1XAJrem5DdVOY5btNgxkG 0c0IxmMjxiyH+p91orfNKedyMRsw6ySjDuFRzmHFRauaUk9BbNKHJo/H+7lbsoJJO//B Oaig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bmuG9CC00/55KT9qwZ18d1AlXtMNmB8K4AK4SMyixiU=; b=LF+F2HcujqUcV0EcQr+rkRuMMRCLPhLwtJ+809W349MTbsXv9cmuJZEJscaHau01vS isQ9BExqSMsOmCHhtm6xqJ5bDqou+H6/3GHJN598Z1taDinB0y+FR23hwSfQ36AxAZGi fC1oEXxsCCrzjKXIfAayYINswULwGeQ1AV1VY+lBCDffvnal41mBNIqsWXQBXAVRDUJu bMCznktsKkRKSfU+T420xiBljVt296aWSLNhkAKWFFXJsScj3974WR68+g3pgU8aBsUZ 306q1NqjHjvKR0za2aBfqIAv2Bpxumrp94YLjKVDp+Jox70cCRuzo1VLbexz7h0+P54I vqig== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531W+FVlHQsaxFcEziv1yi5oxCfYwXw0EDmXlWmwi8274FemrWbm zVV9h+DwV7iqMYWOuj5Md6c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxY+nggHxkDufhEILIenOK/pg71YYOoMNuHyg8X23HYzUD8OR8zExx5Npa48yWZRhmVJ1eK4g== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e7ce:: with SMTP id e14mr9329926wrn.43.1601565197821; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 08:13:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.143] ([170.253.60.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n14sm330270wmi.33.2020.10.01.08.13.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Oct 2020 08:13:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/16] system_data_types.7: Add int_fastN_t family of types To: Jonathan Wakely , mtk.manpages@gmail.com Cc: linux-man@vger.kernel.org, GNU C Library , "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" References: <20201001101559.77163-1-colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com> <20201001101559.77163-6-colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com> From: Alejandro Colomar Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 17:13:16 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org On 2020-10-01 13:07, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > I don't see anything in this man page saying that the types > are all typedefs, rather than new types that are distinct from the > standard integer types. That seems like useful information. > Hello Jonathan, I almost missed this. We (Michael and I) chose not to give any information about typedefs in this page. So the reader should not assume that any type at all, unless explicitly specified, is a typedef. Any type could be defined however the implementation chooses to do, and this page will only give the requirements for the implementation. However, if you still think we should be clearer in this point, we might create a NOTE about this in the end of the page. Your thoughts? Thanks, Alex