All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, yinghai@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@linux.intel.com
Subject: [tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Reimplement memblock_add_region()
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 21:32:02 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-784656f9c680d334e7b4cdb6951c5c913e5a26bf@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1310462166-31469-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

Commit-ID:  784656f9c680d334e7b4cdb6951c5c913e5a26bf
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/784656f9c680d334e7b4cdb6951c5c913e5a26bf
Author:     Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:15:55 +0200
Committer:  H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
CommitDate: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:47:41 -0700

memblock: Reimplement memblock_add_region()

memblock_add_region() carefully checked for merge and overlap
conditions while adding a new region, which is complicated and makes
it difficult to allow arbitrary overlaps or add more merge conditions
(e.g. node ID).

This re-implements memblock_add_region() such that insertion is done
in two steps - all non-overlapping portions of new area are inserted
as separate regions first and then memblock_merge_regions() scan and
merge all neighbouring compatible regions.

This makes addition logic simpler and more versatile and enables
adding node information to memblock.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310462166-31469-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
---
 mm/memblock.c |  197 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index bd3a3a9..992aa18 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -251,117 +251,142 @@ static int __init_memblock memblock_double_array(struct memblock_type *type)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static long __init_memblock memblock_add_region(struct memblock_type *type,
-						phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
+/**
+ * memblock_merge_regions - merge neighboring compatible regions
+ * @type: memblock type to scan
+ *
+ * Scan @type and merge neighboring compatible regions.
+ */
+static void __init_memblock memblock_merge_regions(struct memblock_type *type)
 {
-	phys_addr_t end = base + size;
-	int i, slot = -1;
+	int i = 0;
 
-	/* First try and coalesce this MEMBLOCK with others */
-	for (i = 0; i < type->cnt; i++) {
-		struct memblock_region *rgn = &type->regions[i];
-		phys_addr_t rend = rgn->base + rgn->size;
+	/* cnt never goes below 1 */
+	while (i < type->cnt - 1) {
+		struct memblock_region *this = &type->regions[i];
+		struct memblock_region *next = &type->regions[i + 1];
 
-		/* Exit if there's no possible hits */
-		if (rgn->base > end || rgn->size == 0)
-			break;
-
-		/* Check if we are fully enclosed within an existing
-		 * block
-		 */
-		if (rgn->base <= base && rend >= end)
-			return 0;
+		if (this->base + this->size != next->base) {
+			BUG_ON(this->base + this->size > next->base);
+			i++;
+			continue;
+		}
 
-		/* Check if we overlap or are adjacent with the bottom
-		 * of a block.
-		 */
-		if (base < rgn->base && end >= rgn->base) {
-			/* We extend the bottom of the block down to our
-			 * base
-			 */
-			rgn->base = base;
-			rgn->size = rend - base;
+		this->size += next->size;
+		memmove(next, next + 1, (type->cnt - (i + 1)) * sizeof(*next));
+		type->cnt--;
+	}
+}
 
-			/* Return if we have nothing else to allocate
-			 * (fully coalesced)
-			 */
-			if (rend >= end)
-				return 0;
+/**
+ * memblock_insert_region - insert new memblock region
+ * @type: memblock type to insert into
+ * @idx: index for the insertion point
+ * @base: base address of the new region
+ * @size: size of the new region
+ *
+ * Insert new memblock region [@base,@base+@size) into @type at @idx.
+ * @type must already have extra room to accomodate the new region.
+ */
+static void __init_memblock memblock_insert_region(struct memblock_type *type,
+						   int idx, phys_addr_t base,
+						   phys_addr_t size)
+{
+	struct memblock_region *rgn = &type->regions[idx];
 
-			/* We continue processing from the end of the
-			 * coalesced block.
-			 */
-			base = rend;
-			size = end - base;
-		}
+	BUG_ON(type->cnt >= type->max);
+	memmove(rgn + 1, rgn, (type->cnt - idx) * sizeof(*rgn));
+	rgn->base = base;
+	rgn->size = size;
+	type->cnt++;
+}
 
-		/* Now check if we overlap or are adjacent with the
-		 * top of a block
-		 */
-		if (base <= rend && end >= rend) {
-			/* We adjust our base down to enclose the
-			 * original block and destroy it. It will be
-			 * part of our new allocation. Since we've
-			 * freed an entry, we know we won't fail
-			 * to allocate one later, so we won't risk
-			 * losing the original block allocation.
-			 */
-			size += (base - rgn->base);
-			base = rgn->base;
-			memblock_remove_region(type, i--);
-		}
-	}
+/**
+ * memblock_add_region - add new memblock region
+ * @type: memblock type to add new region into
+ * @base: base address of the new region
+ * @size: size of the new region
+ *
+ * Add new memblock region [@base,@base+@size) into @type.  The new region
+ * is allowed to overlap with existing ones - overlaps don't affect already
+ * existing regions.  @type is guaranteed to be minimal (all neighbouring
+ * compatible regions are merged) after the addition.
+ *
+ * RETURNS:
+ * 0 on success, -errno on failure.
+ */
+static long __init_memblock memblock_add_region(struct memblock_type *type,
+						phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
+{
+	bool insert = false;
+	phys_addr_t obase = base, end = base + size;
+	int i, nr_new;
 
-	/* If the array is empty, special case, replace the fake
-	 * filler region and return
-	 */
-	if ((type->cnt == 1) && (type->regions[0].size == 0)) {
+	/* special case for empty array */
+	if (type->regions[0].size == 0) {
+		WARN_ON(type->cnt != 1);
 		type->regions[0].base = base;
 		type->regions[0].size = size;
 		return 0;
 	}
-
-	/* If we are out of space, we fail. It's too late to resize the array
-	 * but then this shouldn't have happened in the first place.
+repeat:
+	/*
+	 * The following is executed twice.  Once with %false @insert and
+	 * then with %true.  The first counts the number of regions needed
+	 * to accomodate the new area.  The second actually inserts them.
 	 */
-	if (WARN_ON(type->cnt >= type->max))
-		return -1;
+	base = obase;
+	nr_new = 0;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < type->cnt; i++) {
+		struct memblock_region *rgn = &type->regions[i];
+		phys_addr_t rbase = rgn->base;
+		phys_addr_t rend = rbase + rgn->size;
 
-	/* Couldn't coalesce the MEMBLOCK, so add it to the sorted table. */
-	for (i = type->cnt - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
-		if (base < type->regions[i].base) {
-			type->regions[i+1].base = type->regions[i].base;
-			type->regions[i+1].size = type->regions[i].size;
-		} else {
-			type->regions[i+1].base = base;
-			type->regions[i+1].size = size;
-			slot = i + 1;
+		if (rbase >= end)
 			break;
+		if (rend <= base)
+			continue;
+		/*
+		 * @rgn overlaps.  If it separates the lower part of new
+		 * area, insert that portion.
+		 */
+		if (rbase > base) {
+			nr_new++;
+			if (insert)
+				memblock_insert_region(type, i++, base,
+						       rbase - base);
 		}
+		/* area below @rend is dealt with, forget about it */
+		base = min(rend, end);
 	}
-	if (base < type->regions[0].base) {
-		type->regions[0].base = base;
-		type->regions[0].size = size;
-		slot = 0;
+
+	/* insert the remaining portion */
+	if (base < end) {
+		nr_new++;
+		if (insert)
+			memblock_insert_region(type, i, base, end - base);
 	}
-	type->cnt++;
 
-	/* The array is full ? Try to resize it. If that fails, we undo
-	 * our allocation and return an error
+	/*
+	 * If this was the first round, resize array and repeat for actual
+	 * insertions; otherwise, merge and return.
 	 */
-	if (type->cnt == type->max && memblock_double_array(type)) {
-		BUG_ON(slot < 0);
-		memblock_remove_region(type, slot);
-		return -1;
+	if (!insert) {
+		while (type->cnt + nr_new > type->max)
+			if (memblock_double_array(type) < 0)
+				return -ENOMEM;
+		insert = true;
+		goto repeat;
+	} else {
+		memblock_merge_regions(type);
+		return 0;
 	}
-
-	return 0;
 }
 
 long __init_memblock memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
 {
 	return memblock_add_region(&memblock.memory, base, size);
-
 }
 
 static long __init_memblock __memblock_remove(struct memblock_type *type,

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-14 21:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-12  9:15 [PATCHSET x86/mm] memblock, x86: Allow node info in memblock and remove x86 specific memblock code Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 01/13] memblock: Remove memblock_memory_can_coalesce() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:31   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 02/13] memblock: Reimplement memblock_add_region() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:32   ` tip-bot for Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 03/13] memblock: Add optional region->nid Tejun Heo
2011-07-14  9:43   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-07-14  9:43     ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:32     ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 04/13] x86: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP Tejun Heo
2011-07-14  1:35   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14  9:44   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-07-14  9:44     ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:33     ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 05/13] x86: Use __memblock_alloc_base() in early_reserve_e820() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:33   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 06/13] memblock: Implement for_each_free_mem_range() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:34   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 07/13] x86: Replace memblock_x86_find_in_range_size() with for_each_free_mem_range() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:34   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 08/13] memblock, x86: Make free_all_memory_core_early() explicitly free lowmem only Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:35   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 09/13] memblock, x86: Replace __get_free_all_memory_range() with for_each_free_mem_range() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:35   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 10/13] memblock, x86: Reimplement memblock_find_dma_reserve() using iterators Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:36   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 11/13] x86: Use absent_pages_in_range() instead of memblock_x86_hole_size() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:36   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 12/13] memblock, x86: Make ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK a config option Tejun Heo
2011-07-14  9:46   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-07-14  9:46     ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:37     ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 13/13] memblock, x86: Replace memblock_x86_reserve/free_range() with generic ones Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:10   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 20:20     ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:23       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 20:32         ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:38           ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 20:41             ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:43               ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 21:38     ` [tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Cast phys_addr_t to unsigned long long for printf use tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 21:37   ` [tip:x86/memblock] memblock, x86: Replace memblock_x86_reserve/free_range() with generic ones tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 21:06   ` [PATCH 13/13] " Yinghai Lu
2011-07-26 21:46     ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-27  0:59       ` Yinghai Lu
2011-07-27  8:07         ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 23:26 ` [PATCHSET x86/mm] memblock, x86: Allow node info in memblock and remove x86 specific memblock code Yinghai Lu
2011-07-13  3:21   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-13  9:16     ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-13  9:11   ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-13 19:06     ` Yinghai Lu
2011-07-14  9:42 ` [PATCH 2.5/13] memblock: Use __meminit[data] instead of __init[data] Tejun Heo
2011-07-14  9:42   ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:00   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-07-14 21:24     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 21:24       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-15  5:45     ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:32   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-14  9:49 ` [PATCHSET x86/mm] memblock, x86: Allow node info in memblock and remove x86 specific memblock code Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-784656f9c680d334e7b4cdb6951c5c913e5a26bf@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.