All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Borislav Petkov <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, bp@suse.de,
	mingo@kernel.org, tv@lio96.de, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Rename mc_intel variable to mc
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 04:23:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-de778275c295825e6638f3f74103f40642d45caa@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454499225-21544-10-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de>

Commit-ID:  de778275c295825e6638f3f74103f40642d45caa
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/de778275c295825e6638f3f74103f40642d45caa
Author:     Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
AuthorDate: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:33:37 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:41:17 +0100

x86/microcode/intel: Rename mc_intel variable to mc

Well, it is apparent what it points to - microcode. And since it is the
intel loader, no need for the "_intel" suffix. Use "!" for the 0/NULL
checks, while at it.

No functionality change.

Tested-by: Thomas Voegtle <tv@lio96.de>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1454499225-21544-10-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index 9f5fe72..d1b2f58 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -601,19 +601,19 @@ void show_ucode_info_early(void)
  */
 static void print_ucode(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
 {
-	struct microcode_intel *mc_intel;
+	struct microcode_intel *mc;
 	int *delay_ucode_info_p;
 	int *current_mc_date_p;
 
-	mc_intel = uci->mc;
-	if (mc_intel == NULL)
+	mc = uci->mc;
+	if (!mc)
 		return;
 
 	delay_ucode_info_p = (int *)__pa_nodebug(&delay_ucode_info);
 	current_mc_date_p = (int *)__pa_nodebug(&current_mc_date);
 
 	*delay_ucode_info_p = 1;
-	*current_mc_date_p = mc_intel->hdr.date;
+	*current_mc_date_p = mc->hdr.date;
 }
 #else
 
@@ -628,29 +628,29 @@ static inline void flush_tlb_early(void)
 
 static inline void print_ucode(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci)
 {
-	struct microcode_intel *mc_intel;
+	struct microcode_intel *mc;
 
-	mc_intel = uci->mc;
-	if (mc_intel == NULL)
+	mc = uci->mc;
+	if (!mc)
 		return;
 
-	print_ucode_info(uci, mc_intel->hdr.date);
+	print_ucode_info(uci, mc->hdr.date);
 }
 #endif
 
 static int apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool early)
 {
-	struct microcode_intel *mc_intel;
+	struct microcode_intel *mc;
 	unsigned int val[2];
 
-	mc_intel = uci->mc;
-	if (mc_intel == NULL)
+	mc = uci->mc;
+	if (!mc)
 		return 0;
 
 	/* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */
 	native_wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE,
-	      (unsigned long) mc_intel->bits,
-	      (unsigned long) mc_intel->bits >> 16 >> 16);
+	      (unsigned long)mc->bits,
+	      (unsigned long)mc->bits >> 16 >> 16);
 	native_wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
 
 	/* As documented in the SDM: Do a CPUID 1 here */
@@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool early)
 
 	/* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
 	native_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, val[0], val[1]);
-	if (val[1] != mc_intel->hdr.rev)
+	if (val[1] != mc->hdr.rev)
 		return -1;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool early)
 	if (early)
 		print_ucode(uci);
 	else
-		print_ucode_info(uci, mc_intel->hdr.date);
+		print_ucode_info(uci, mc->hdr.date);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
  * return 0 - no update found
  * return 1 - found update
  */
-static int get_matching_mc(struct microcode_intel *mc_intel, int cpu)
+static int get_matching_mc(struct microcode_intel *mc, int cpu)
 {
 	struct cpu_signature cpu_sig;
 	unsigned int csig, cpf, crev;
@@ -832,38 +832,38 @@ static int get_matching_mc(struct microcode_intel *mc_intel, int cpu)
 	cpf = cpu_sig.pf;
 	crev = cpu_sig.rev;
 
-	return has_newer_microcode(mc_intel, csig, cpf, crev);
+	return has_newer_microcode(mc, csig, cpf, crev);
 }
 
 static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
 {
-	struct microcode_intel *mc_intel;
+	struct microcode_intel *mc;
 	struct ucode_cpu_info *uci;
 	unsigned int val[2];
 	int cpu_num = raw_smp_processor_id();
 	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu_num);
 
 	uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
-	mc_intel = uci->mc;
+	mc = uci->mc;
 
 	/* We should bind the task to the CPU */
 	BUG_ON(cpu_num != cpu);
 
-	if (mc_intel == NULL)
+	if (!mc)
 		return 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * Microcode on this CPU could be updated earlier. Only apply the
-	 * microcode patch in mc_intel when it is newer than the one on this
+	 * microcode patch in mc when it is newer than the one on this
 	 * CPU.
 	 */
-	if (get_matching_mc(mc_intel, cpu) == 0)
+	if (!get_matching_mc(mc, cpu))
 		return 0;
 
 	/* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */
 	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE,
-	      (unsigned long) mc_intel->bits,
-	      (unsigned long) mc_intel->bits >> 16 >> 16);
+	      (unsigned long) mc->bits,
+	      (unsigned long) mc->bits >> 16 >> 16);
 	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, 0, 0);
 
 	/* As documented in the SDM: Do a CPUID 1 here */
@@ -872,16 +872,16 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
 	/* get the current revision from MSR 0x8B */
 	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV, val[0], val[1]);
 
-	if (val[1] != mc_intel->hdr.rev) {
+	if (val[1] != mc->hdr.rev) {
 		pr_err("CPU%d update to revision 0x%x failed\n",
-		       cpu_num, mc_intel->hdr.rev);
+		       cpu_num, mc->hdr.rev);
 		return -1;
 	}
 	pr_info("CPU%d updated to revision 0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n",
 		cpu_num, val[1],
-		mc_intel->hdr.date & 0xffff,
-		mc_intel->hdr.date >> 24,
-		(mc_intel->hdr.date >> 16) & 0xff);
+		mc->hdr.date & 0xffff,
+		mc->hdr.date >> 24,
+		(mc->hdr.date >> 16) & 0xff);
 
 	uci->cpu_sig.rev = val[1];
 	c->microcode = val[1];

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-09 12:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-03 11:33 [PATCH 00/17] x86/microcode: Untangle loader from BLK_DEV_INITRD Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 01/17] x86/microcode: Untangle " Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:20   ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 02/17] x86/microcode/intel: Make early loader look for builtin microcode too Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:20   ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 03/17] x86/microcode: Remove redundant __setup() param parsing Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:21   ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 04/17] x86/microcode: Remove an unneeded NULL check Borislav Petkov
2014-01-20 10:30   ` [patch] x86, microcode: remove " Dan Carpenter
2016-02-09 12:21     ` [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode: Remove " tip-bot for Dan Carpenter
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 05/17] x86/microcode: Issue update message only once Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:21   ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 06/17] x86/microcode/AMD: Drop redundant printk prefix Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:22   ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 07/17] x86/microcode/intel: Rename local variables of type struct mc_saved_data Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:22   ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 08/17] x86/microcode/intel: Rename mc_saved_count to num_saved Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:22   ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 09/17] x86/microcode/intel: Rename mc_intel variable to mc Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:23   ` tip-bot for Borislav Petkov [this message]
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 10/17] x86/microcode/intel: Move the BUG_ON up and turn it into WARN_ON Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:23   ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 11/17] x86/microcode/intel: Cleanup apply_microcode_intel() Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:24   ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 12/17] x86/microcode/intel: Use *wrmsrl variants Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:24   ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 13/17] x86/microcode/intel: Rename mc_saved_in_initrd Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:24   ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 14/17] x86/microcode/intel: Remove unused arg of get_matching_model_microcode() Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:25   ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 15/17] x86/microcode/intel: Cleanup get_matching_model_microcode() Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:25   ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 16/17] x86/microcode/AMD: Issue microcode updated message later Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:25   ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-02-03 11:33 ` [PATCH 17/17] x86/microcode: Document builtin microcode loading method Borislav Petkov
2016-02-09 12:26   ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-de778275c295825e6638f3f74103f40642d45caa@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tv@lio96.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.