alsa-devel.alsa-project.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@intel.com>,
	Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhangn1985@outlook.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: meson: cards: deal dpcm flag change
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:32:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1jmu2g6wq0.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e950898e-0a07-4f75-2640-ec8039d81464@samsung.com>


On Thu 27 Aug 2020 at 14:43, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> wrote:

> Hi Jerome,
>
> On 31.07.2020 14:06, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> Commit b73287f0b074 ("ASoC: soc-pcm: dpcm: fix playback/capture checks")
>> changed the meaning of dpcm_playback/dpcm_capture and now requires the
>> CPU DAI BE to aligned with those flags.
>>
>> This broke all Amlogic cards with uni-directional backends (All gx and
>> most axg cards).
>>
>> While I'm still confused as to how this change is an improvement, those
>> cards can't remain broken forever. Hopefully, next time an API change is
>> done like that, all the users will be updated as part of the change, and
>> not left to fend for themselves.
>>
>> Fixes: b73287f0b074 ("ASoC: soc-pcm: dpcm: fix playback/capture checks")
>> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
>
> This patch landed finally in v5.9-rc1. I've noticed it causes a 
> following warning on Hardkernel's Odroid N2 board 
> (arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-g12b-odroid-n2.dtb):

Looks like the after match of the flag change again ...

>
> meson-drm ff900000.vpu: [drm] fb0: mesondrmfb frame buffer device
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 66 at sound/soc/soc-core.c:817

Marek, is it possible that you have CONFIG_LOCKDEP enabled in your
configuration ?

snd_soc_find_dai() is called by snd_soc_dai_link_set_capabilities().
Indeed, the client_mutex will not be help by any of the user of 
snd_soc_dai_link_set_capabilities() when called.

So I believe simple card and qcom will be impacted as well.

> snd_soc_find_dai+0xe4/0xf0
> Modules linked in: dw_hdmi_i2s_audio dw_hdmi_cec meson_gxl realtek 
> dwmac_generic crct10dif_ce snd_soc_meson_axg_sound_card 
> snd_soc_meson_card_utils rc_odroid pwm_meson meson_ir 
> snd_soc_meson_g12a_toacodec snd_soc_meson_axg_tdmout rtc_meson_vrtc 
> snd_soc_meson_g12a_tohdmitx snd_soc_meson_codec_glue mdio_mux_meson_g12a 
> snd_soc_meson_axg_tdmin dwmac_meson8b stmmac_platform 
> reset_meson_audio_arb snd_soc_meson_axg_frddr axg_audio 
> snd_soc_meson_axg_toddr sclk_div clk_phase meson_rng stmmac rng_core 
> meson_dw_hdmi snd_soc_meson_axg_fifo meson_drm meson_canvas mdio_xpcs 
> dw_hdmi snd_soc_meson_t9015 display_connector nvmem_meson_efuse 
> snd_soc_meson_axg_tdm_interface snd_soc_meson_axg_tdm_formatter 
> snd_soc_simple_amplifier
> CPU: 3 PID: 66 Comm: kworker/3:1 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc1 #1527
> Hardware name: Hardkernel ODROID-N2 (DT)
> Workqueue: events deferred_probe_work_func
> pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--)
> pc : snd_soc_find_dai+0xe4/0xf0
> lr : snd_soc_find_dai+0xe0/0xf0
> ...
> Call trace:
>   snd_soc_find_dai+0xe4/0xf0
>   snd_soc_dai_link_set_capabilities+0x68/0x160
>   axg_card_add_link+0x188/0x5c4 [snd_soc_meson_axg_sound_card]
>   meson_card_probe+0x1e0/0x960 [snd_soc_meson_card_utils]
>   platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xa8
>   really_probe+0x110/0x400
>   driver_probe_device+0x54/0xb8
>   __device_attach_driver+0x90/0xc0
>   bus_for_each_drv+0x70/0xc8
>   __device_attach+0xec/0x150
>   device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
>   bus_probe_device+0x94/0xa0
>   deferred_probe_work_func+0x70/0xa8
>   process_one_work+0x2a8/0x718
>   worker_thread+0x48/0x460
>   kthread+0x134/0x160
>   ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
> irq event stamp: 269690
> hardirqs last  enabled at (269689): [<ffff800010f6048c>] 
> _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x7c/0x98
> hardirqs last disabled at (269690): [<ffff800010025a68>] 
> do_debug_exception+0x140/0x26c
> softirqs last  enabled at (269318): [<ffff800010001654>] 
> efi_header_end+0x654/0x6d4
> softirqs last disabled at (269313): [<ffff80001008929c>] 
> irq_exit+0x16c/0x178
> ---[ end trace 56a3ea4fa00c37c8 ]---
> ...
> axg-sound-card sound: ASoC: no DMI vendor name!
>
> The warning is repeated 10 times.

That's the probe defferal mechanism causing the repeat

>
> The bisect between v5.8-rc1 and v5.9-rc1 points to the commit 
> c8f7dbdbaa15 ("Merge remote-tracking branch 'asoc/for-5.8' into 
> asoc-linus"), which introduced a branch with this patch.
>
> The commit with this patch is applied on the earlier kernel release 
> (da3f23fde9d7 "ASoC: meson: cards: deal dpcm flag change" on top of 
> v5.7-rc1) worked fine, so it looks that there is an interference with 
> something merged later.
>
> If I revert this patch on top of v5.9-rc1 or current linux-next, the 
> warning is gone.

... but any aml platform with uni-directional backend (not the N2, lucky
you) would be broken.

> Let me know how I can help debugging this issue.

If you have CONFIG_LOCKDEP enabled, try disabling see how it goes and
report. It is not a fix but at least you'll be unblocked.

>
> Best regards


  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-27 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-31 12:06 [PATCH] ASoC: meson: cards: deal dpcm flag change Jerome Brunet
2020-07-31 18:54 ` Mark Brown
     [not found] ` <CGME20200827124306eucas1p2c355345ca848e396f1fb06a7ef7a111e@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2020-08-27 12:43   ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-08-27 13:32     ` Jerome Brunet [this message]
2020-08-27 14:46       ` Marek Szyprowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1jmu2g6wq0.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com \
    --to=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=pierre-louis.bossart@intel.com \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    --cc=stephan@gerhold.net \
    --cc=zhangn1985@outlook.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).