On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 06:35:08PM +0200, Ladislav Michl wrote:

> Hmm, too late it seems...
> Patch should actually remove <linux/gpio.h> as this is legacy one (see comment
> on the top and also Documentation/driver-api/gpio/consumer.rst)

Yes, leaving that is an oversight.

> And that brings a question. Given this is -next only is it actually possible
> to squash fixes into 1a476abc723e ("tas2770: add tas2770 smart PA kernel driver")
> just to make bisect a bit more happy?

No:

> > If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
> > should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
> > patches will not be replaced.

Apart from anything else I've merged up the fixes branch IIRC which
causes trouble.