On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 02:41:30PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 12/02/2020 16.35, Tony Lindgren wrote:

> > Oops, that's not good. So should we just keep the old naming if there's
> > only one endpoint?

> That's an option, yes, if we really need extra dummy McBSP DAIs at all,
> again, let's hear from Morimoto-san or Mark.

We really shouldn't need dummy DAIs at all I think, if we do it feels
like there's a problem.  It's quite possible that there is actually a
problem here though...