On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 04:19:39PM +0200, Clément Péron wrote: > We are actually using a complex formula to just return a bunch of > simple values. Also this formula is wrong for sun4i when calling > get_wss() the function return 4 instead of 3. > > Replace this with a simpler switch case. > > Also drop the i2s params which is unused and return a simple int as > returning an error code could be out of range for an s8 and there is > no optim to return a s8 here. > > Fixes: 619c15f7fac9 ("ASoC: sun4i-i2s: Change SR and WSS computation") > Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai > Signed-off-by: Clément Péron > --- > sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c b/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c > index 1f577dbc20a6..8e497fb3de09 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c > +++ b/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c > @@ -175,8 +175,8 @@ struct sun4i_i2s_quirks { > unsigned int num_mclk_dividers; > > unsigned long (*get_bclk_parent_rate)(const struct sun4i_i2s *); > - s8 (*get_sr)(const struct sun4i_i2s *, int); > - s8 (*get_wss)(const struct sun4i_i2s *, int); > + int (*get_sr)(unsigned int width); > + int (*get_wss)(unsigned int width); > int (*set_chan_cfg)(const struct sun4i_i2s *i2s, > unsigned int channels, unsigned int slots, > unsigned int slot_width); > @@ -381,37 +381,56 @@ static int sun4i_i2s_set_clk_rate(struct snd_soc_dai *dai, > return 0; > } > > -static s8 sun4i_i2s_get_sr(const struct sun4i_i2s *i2s, int width) > +static int sun4i_i2s_get_sr(unsigned int width) > { > - if (width < 16 || width > 24) > - return -EINVAL; > - > - if (width % 4) > - return -EINVAL; > + switch (width) { > + case 16: > + return 0x0; > + case 20: > + return 0x1; > + case 24: > + return 0x2; > + } > > - return (width - 16) / 4; > + return -EINVAL; > } > > -static s8 sun4i_i2s_get_wss(const struct sun4i_i2s *i2s, int width) > +static int sun4i_i2s_get_wss(unsigned int width) > { > - if (width < 16 || width > 32) > - return -EINVAL; > - > - if (width % 4) > - return -EINVAL; > + switch (width) { > + case 16: > + return 0x0; > + case 20: > + return 0x1; > + case 24: > + return 0x2; > + case 32: > + return 0x3; > + } Like I said in the previous version, I'm not really sure why we need to use the hexadecimal representation here? Maxime