From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takashi Sakamoto Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2] Enhancement of support for Firewire devices Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 20:23:09 +0900 Message-ID: <5317091D.10807@sakamocchi.jp> References: <5316963F.1000206@sakamocchi.jp> <531703B0.3050503@sakamocchi.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp302.phy.lolipop.jp (smtp302.phy.lolipop.jp [210.157.22.85]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8190265958 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 12:23:16 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Takashi Iwai Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org (Mar 5 2014 20:09), Takashi Iwai wrote: > I meant that the rebased patches weren't needed to be resent, if > rebase were the only action you made. But you fixed other things, > right? Then each patch must be submitted again. Right. I added changes into the patches since last pull-request. Now I understand what you meant. > And, in general, I won't do git pull to my repo from github. So, the > subject prefix '[GIT PULL]' makes no sense to me. It's still useful > to keep the git repo for easier review, though. OK. I remember it for my future work. >> # And this mailman ignored my message again... > > Relax, it's not lost. It just takes time due to SPAM filtering or > whatever running there. Hmm. I'll wait for blasting my message a bit more... Thanks Takashi Sakamoto o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp