From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB9AC49ED9 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 04:45:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8D6C20856 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 04:45:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="Sd4RklNU" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A8D6C20856 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=renesas.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF3891737; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 06:44:57 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz EF3891737 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1568263548; bh=fyG3h96m0VGRPwmLBo7eEsThQsiaG9Jpntu520Y4Mpc=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=Sd4RklNUlUXBlvdnTGMZvBzDesNy4q+yNJ8reZ+ADDAxemKXznGBvASbCW+PZ4sEJ ew97/O7gu6fX+gDqzWLgwjRDCYWlS1kUiTvu//OYU9srjChlHOfLrjxkiCEyaJHxs6 n73AFQZKXOc2S2rVcapoRzdR79iucW9u30Zh8jcg= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2516F805FF; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 06:43:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id BB54BF80600; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 06:43:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from relmlie6.idc.renesas.com (relmlor2.renesas.com [210.160.252.172]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3126EF805FE for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 06:43:37 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 3126EF805FE Date: 12 Sep 2019 13:43:37 +0900 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,495,1559487600"; d="scan'208";a="26174839" Received: from unknown (HELO relmlir5.idc.renesas.com) ([10.200.68.151]) by relmlie6.idc.renesas.com with ESMTP; 12 Sep 2019 13:43:37 +0900 Received: from morimoto-PC.renesas.com (unknown [10.166.18.140]) by relmlir5.idc.renesas.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECCCD400F4FB; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:43:36 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <8736h2f7k7.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> From: Kuninori Morimoto User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 Emacs/24.5 Mule/6.0 To: Mark Brown In-Reply-To: <87h85if7u8.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> References: <87h85if7u8.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Cc: Linux-ALSA Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 10/14] ASoC: soc-core: remove soc_remove_dai_links() X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" From: Kuninori Morimoto It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming, like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc. But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc. It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to debug. soc_cleanup_card_resources() (a) which is paired function of snd_soc_instantiate_card() (A) is calling soc_remove_dai_links() (*) to remove card related resources, but it is breaking add/remove balance (B)(b)(C)(c)(D)(d), in other words these should be called from soc_cleanup_card_resources() (a) from balance point of view. More headacke is that it is using original removing method for dai_link even though we already have snd_soc_remove_dai_link() which is the function for it (d). This patch removes snd_soc_remove_dai_links() and balance up code. static void soc_remove_dai_links(...) { ... (b) soc_remove_link_dais(card); (c) soc_remove_link_components(card); for_each_card_links_safe(card, link, _link) { ... /* it should use snd_soc_remove_dai_link() here */ (d) list_del(&link->list); } } (a) static int soc_cleanup_card_resources(...) { ... /* remove and free each DAI */ (*) soc_remove_dai_links(card); ... } (A) static int snd_soc_instantiate_card(struct snd_soc_card *card) { ... /* add predefined DAI links to the list */ for_each_card_prelinks(card, i, dai_link) (B) snd_soc_add_dai_link(card, dai_link); ... /* probe all components used by DAI links on this card */ (C) ret = soc_probe_link_components(card); ... /* probe all DAI links on this card */ (D) ret = soc_probe_link_dais(card); ... } Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto --- v1 -> v2 - no change sound/soc/soc-core.c | 26 ++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c index f6a01ae..430ed33 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c @@ -1275,23 +1275,6 @@ static int soc_probe_link_components(struct snd_soc_card *card) return 0; } -static void soc_remove_dai_links(struct snd_soc_card *card) -{ - struct snd_soc_dai_link *link, *_link; - - soc_remove_link_dais(card); - - soc_remove_link_components(card); - - for_each_card_links_safe(card, link, _link) { - if (link->dobj.type == SND_SOC_DOBJ_DAI_LINK) - dev_warn(card->dev, "Topology forgot to remove link %s?\n", - link->name); - - list_del(&link->list); - } -} - static int soc_init_dai_link(struct snd_soc_card *card, struct snd_soc_dai_link *link) { @@ -1924,6 +1907,8 @@ static void soc_check_tplg_fes(struct snd_soc_card *card) static void soc_cleanup_card_resources(struct snd_soc_card *card) { + struct snd_soc_dai_link *link, *_link; + /* free the ALSA card at first; this syncs with pending operations */ if (card->snd_card) { snd_card_free(card->snd_card); @@ -1931,7 +1916,12 @@ static void soc_cleanup_card_resources(struct snd_soc_card *card) } /* remove and free each DAI */ - soc_remove_dai_links(card); + soc_remove_link_dais(card); + soc_remove_link_components(card); + + for_each_card_links_safe(card, link, _link) + snd_soc_remove_dai_link(card, link); + soc_remove_pcm_runtimes(card); /* remove auxiliary devices */ -- 2.7.4 _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel