From: Wen Gong <wgong@codeaurora.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
ath10k <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: change len of trace_ath10k_log_dbg_dump for large buffer size
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:01:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b479a88331dbf969f07708eabe53d14@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210209163431.11133472@gandalf.local.home>
On 2021-02-10 05:34, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 14:55:31 -0500
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
>> > [for-next][PATCH 2/2] tracing: Use temp buffer when filtering events
>> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/f16b14066317f6a926b6636df6974966@codeaurora.org/
>>
>> Note, that is only used when filtering happens, which doesn't appear
>> to be
>> the case here.
>
> I was basing this off of the original commands, but the stack dump says
> otherwise. But it should still work.
>
>>
>> >
>> > It seems like we should still try to get that fixed somehow, even if
>> > the below change is fine on its own (it probably doesn't make sense to
>> > such a large amount of data via tracepoints). It would be unfortunate
>> > for next poor soul to hit the same issues, just because they wanted to
>> > dump a few KB.
>>
>> Yeah, it was a design decision to cap the max size of events to just
>> under
>> PAGE_SIZE. The ring buffer is broken up into pages (for zero copy
>> transfers to file systems and the network). Thus, no event is allowed
>> to be
>> bigger than a page (and actually a bit smaller)
>>
>> That said, it shouldn't have crashed, it should have just failed to
>> record.
>>
>> I'll test it out and see why it crashed.
>
> Looking at the original report, I see:
>
> CPU: 1 PID: 141 Comm: kworker/u16:1 Not tainted 4.19.139 #162
>
> Does this still crash on the latest kernel?
>
> -- Steve
Not tested with latest kernel.
The reason is below which I said in
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/b504b3d7e989cae108669a0cd3072454@codeaurora.org/
the per cpu buffer seems it is initilized in
trace_buffered_event_enable,
it is only 1 page size as below:
void trace_buffered_event_enable(void)
{
...
for_each_tracing_cpu(cpu) {
page = alloc_pages_node(cpu_to_node(cpu),
GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY, 0);
If the size of buffer to trace is more than 1 page, such as 46680, then
it trigger kernel crash/panic in my case while run trace-cmd.
After debugging, the trace_file->flags in
trace_event_buffer_lock_reserve is 0x40b while run trace-cmd, and it is
0x403 while collecting ftrace log.
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-10 2:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-09 2:59 [PATCH] ath10k: change len of trace_ath10k_log_dbg_dump for large buffer size Wen Gong
2021-02-09 7:34 ` Kalle Valo
2021-02-09 19:35 ` Brian Norris
2021-02-09 19:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-02-09 21:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-02-10 2:01 ` Wen Gong [this message]
2021-02-10 16:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-02-10 16:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-02-10 16:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-08 7:22 ` Wen Gong
2021-02-10 2:11 ` Wen Gong
2021-02-10 2:14 ` Brian Norris
2021-02-10 2:24 ` Wen Gong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9b479a88331dbf969f07708eabe53d14@codeaurora.org \
--to=wgong@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).