From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Add missing selftests kconfig options
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2023 23:40:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <168600841975.14340.2367835892708005381.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230602140108.1177900-1-void@manifault.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>:
On Fri, 2 Jun 2023 09:01:08 -0500 you wrote:
> Our selftests of course rely on the kernel being built with
> CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y, though this (nor its dependencies of
> CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y and CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF4=y) are not specified.
> This causes the wrong kernel to be built, and selftests to similarly
> fail to build.
>
> Additionally, in the BPF selftests kconfig file,
> CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MARK=y is specified, so that the 'u_int32_t mark'
> field will be present in the definition of struct nf_conn. While a
> dependency of CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MARK=y, CONFIG_NETFILTER_ADVANCED=y,
> should be enabled by default, I've run into instances of
> CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MARK not being set because CONFIG_NETFILTER_ADVANCED
> isn't set, and have to manually enable them with make menuconfig.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- selftests/bpf: Add missing selftests kconfig options
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/3d272c2fa804
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-05 23:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-02 14:01 [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Add missing selftests kconfig options David Vernet
2023-06-02 16:27 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-05 23:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=168600841975.14340.2367835892708005381.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).