From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ast@fb.com,
andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] libbpf: make DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS macro strictly a variable declaration
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 21:38:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191022193850.GC31343@pc-66.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191022172100.3281465-1-andriin@fb.com>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:21:00AM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> LIBBPF_OPTS is implemented as a mix of field declaration and memset
> + assignment. This makes it neither variable declaration nor purely
> statements, which is a problem, because you can't mix it with either
> other variable declarations nor other function statements, because C90
> compiler mode emits warning on mixing all that together.
>
> This patch changes LIBBPF_OPTS into a strictly declaration of variable
> and solves this problem, as can be seen in case of bpftool, which
> previously would emit compiler warning, if done this way (LIBBPF_OPTS as
> part of function variables declaration block).
>
> This patch also renames LIBBPF_OPTS into DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS to follow
> kernel convention for similar macros more closely.
>
> v1->v2:
> - rename LIBBPF_OPTS into DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS (Jakub Sitnicki).
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Applied, thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-22 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-22 17:21 [PATCH v2 bpf-next] libbpf: make DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS macro strictly a variable declaration Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-22 17:42 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-22 19:38 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191022193850.GC31343@pc-66.home \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).