bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik@metanetworks.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] test_bpf: Introduce 'gso_linear_no_head_frag' skb_segment test
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 16:42:23 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191025134223.2761-3-shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191025134223.2761-1-shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>

Following reports of skb_segment() hitting a BUG_ON when working on
GROed skbs which have their gso_size mangled (e.g. after a
bpf_skb_change_proto call), add a reproducer test that mimics the
input skbs that lead to the mentioned BUG_ON as in [1] and validates the
fix submitted in [2].

[1] https://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2019/08/26/110
[2] commit 3dcbdb134f32 ("net: gso: Fix skb_segment splat when splitting gso_size mangled skb having linear-headed frag_list")

Signed-off-by: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
---
 lib/test_bpf.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index c952df82b515..cecb230833be 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -6859,6 +6859,60 @@ static __init struct sk_buff *build_test_skb(void)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+static __init struct sk_buff *build_test_skb_linear_no_head_frag(void)
+{
+	unsigned int alloc_size = 2000;
+	unsigned int headroom = 102, doffset = 72, data_size = 1308;
+	struct sk_buff *skb[2];
+	int i;
+
+	/* skbs linked in a frag_list, both with linear data, with head_frag=0
+	 * (data allocated by kmalloc), both have tcp data of 1308 bytes
+	 * (total payload is 2616 bytes).
+	 * Data offset is 72 bytes (40 ipv6 hdr, 32 tcp hdr). Some headroom.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
+		skb[i] = alloc_skb(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!skb[i]) {
+			if (i == 0)
+				goto err_skb0;
+			else
+				goto err_skb1;
+		}
+
+		skb[i]->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
+		skb_reserve(skb[i], headroom);
+		skb_put(skb[i], doffset + data_size);
+		skb_reset_network_header(skb[i]);
+		if (i == 0)
+			skb_reset_mac_header(skb[i]);
+		else
+			skb_set_mac_header(skb[i], -ETH_HLEN);
+		__skb_pull(skb[i], doffset);
+	}
+
+	/* setup shinfo.
+	 * mimic bpf_skb_proto_4_to_6, which resets gso_segs and assigns a
+	 * reduced gso_size.
+	 */
+	skb_shinfo(skb[0])->gso_size = 1288;
+	skb_shinfo(skb[0])->gso_type = SKB_GSO_TCPV6 | SKB_GSO_DODGY;
+	skb_shinfo(skb[0])->gso_segs = 0;
+	skb_shinfo(skb[0])->frag_list = skb[1];
+
+	/* adjust skb[0]'s len */
+	skb[0]->len += skb[1]->len;
+	skb[0]->data_len += skb[1]->len;
+	skb[0]->truesize += skb[1]->truesize;
+
+	return skb[0];
+
+err_skb1:
+	kfree_skb(skb[0]);
+err_skb0:
+	return NULL;
+}
+
 struct skb_segment_test {
 	const char *descr;
 	struct sk_buff *(*build_skb)(void);
@@ -6871,6 +6925,15 @@ static struct skb_segment_test skb_segment_tests[] __initconst = {
 		.build_skb = build_test_skb,
 		.features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_GSO_PARTIAL | NETIF_F_IP_CSUM |
 			    NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM | NETIF_F_RXCSUM
+	},
+	{
+		.descr = "gso_linear_no_head_frag",
+		.build_skb = build_test_skb_linear_no_head_frag,
+		.features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_FRAGLIST |
+			    NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX | NETIF_F_GSO |
+			    NETIF_F_LLTX_BIT | NETIF_F_GRO |
+			    NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM | NETIF_F_RXCSUM |
+			    NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_TX_BIT
 	}
 };
 
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-25 13:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-25 13:42 [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] test_bpf: Add an skb_segment test for a linear head_frag=0 skb whose gso_size was mangled Shmulik Ladkani
2019-10-25 13:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] test_bpf: Refactor test_skb_segment() to allow testing skb_segment() on numerous different skbs Shmulik Ladkani
2019-10-25 13:42 ` Shmulik Ladkani [this message]
2019-10-30 15:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] test_bpf: Add an skb_segment test for a linear head_frag=0 skb whose gso_size was mangled Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191025134223.2761-3-shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
    --to=shmulik@metanetworks.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).