From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: ecree@solarflare.com, yhs@fb.com, daniel@iogearbox.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bpf-next PATCH 10/10] bpf: test_verifier, add alu32 bounds tracking tests
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 23:34:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200326063441.ymitkh5z6sgevbm4@ast-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <158507165554.15666.6019652542965367828.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower>
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 10:40:55AM -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> Its possible to have divergent ALU32 and ALU64 bounds when using JMP32
> instructins and ALU64 arithmatic operations. Sometimes the clang will
> even generate this code. Because the case is a bit tricky lets add
> a specific test for it.
>
> Here is pseudocode asm version to illustrate the idea,
>
> 1 r0 = 0xffffffff00000001;
> 2 if w0 > 1 goto %l[fail];
> 3 r0 += 1
> 5 if w0 > 2 goto %l[fail]
> 6 exit
>
> The intent here is the verifier will fail the load if the 32bit bounds
> are not tracked correctly through ALU64 op. Similarly we can check the
> 64bit bounds are correctly zero extended after ALU32 ops.
>
> 1 r0 = 0xffffffff00000001;
> 2 w0 += 1
> 2 if r0 < 0xffffffff00000001 goto %l[fail];
This should be 3.
> + "bounds check mixed 32bit and 64bit arithmatic. test2",
> + .insns = {
> + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
> + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1),
> + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_1, 32),
> + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 1),
> + /* r1 = 0xffffFFFF00000001 */
> + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 3),
> + /* r1 = 0x2 */
> + BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 1),
> + /* check ALU32 op zero extends 64bit bounds */
> + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 1),
> + BPF_JMP_A(1),
> + /* invalid ldx if bounds are lost above */
> + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, -1),
> + BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> + },
> + .result = ACCEPT
> +},
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-26 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-24 17:37 [bpf-next PATCH 00/10] ALU32 bounds tracking support John Fastabend
2020-03-24 17:37 ` [bpf-next PATCH 01/10] bpf: verifier, do_refine_retval_range may clamp umin to 0 incorrectly John Fastabend
2020-03-24 17:38 ` [bpf-next PATCH 02/10] bpf: verifer, refactor adjust_scalar_min_max_vals John Fastabend
2020-03-26 6:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-24 17:38 ` [bpf-next PATCH 03/10] bpf: verifer, adjust_scalar_min_max_vals to always call update_reg_bounds() John Fastabend
2020-03-24 17:38 ` [bpf-next PATCH 04/10] bpf: verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking John Fastabend
2020-03-26 6:20 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-26 15:18 ` John Fastabend
2020-03-24 17:39 ` [bpf-next PATCH 05/10] bpf: verifier, return value is an int in do_refine_retval_range John Fastabend
2020-03-26 6:23 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-26 15:52 ` John Fastabend
2020-03-24 17:39 ` [bpf-next PATCH 06/10] bpf: test_progs, add test to catch retval refine error handling John Fastabend
2020-03-24 17:39 ` [bpf-next PATCH 07/10] bpf: test_verifier, bpf_get_stack return value add <0 John Fastabend
2020-03-26 6:33 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-26 15:48 ` John Fastabend
2020-03-24 17:40 ` [bpf-next PATCH 08/10] bpf: test_verifier, #70 error message updates for 32-bit right shift John Fastabend
2020-03-24 17:40 ` [bpf-next PATCH 09/10] bpf: test_verifier, #65 error message updates for trunc of boundary-cross John Fastabend
2020-03-24 17:40 ` [bpf-next PATCH 10/10] bpf: test_verifier, add alu32 bounds tracking tests John Fastabend
2020-03-26 6:34 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200326063441.ymitkh5z6sgevbm4@ast-mbp \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=ecree@solarflare.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).