bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	kuba@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, kernel-team@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH -tip 3/3] x86/kprobes,orc: Unwind optprobe trampoline correctly
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 10:57:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210331155736.qyuph7sgabmqqmq3@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <161716949640.721514.14252504351086671126.stgit@devnote2>

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 02:44:56PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC
> +unsigned long recover_optprobe_trampoline(unsigned long addr, unsigned long *sp)
> +{
> +	unsigned long offset, entry, probe_addr;
> +	struct optimized_kprobe *op;
> +	struct orc_entry *orc;
> +
> +	entry = find_kprobe_optinsn_slot_entry(addr);
> +	if (!entry)
> +		return addr;
> +
> +	offset = addr - entry;
> +
> +	/* Decode arg1 and get the optprobe */
> +	op = (void *)extract_set_arg1((void *)(entry + TMPL_MOVE_IDX));
> +	if (!op)
> +		return addr;
> +
> +	probe_addr = (unsigned long)op->kp.addr;
> +
> +	if (offset < TMPL_END_IDX) {
> +		orc = orc_find((unsigned long)optprobe_template_func + offset);
> +		if (!orc || orc->sp_reg != ORC_REG_SP)
> +			return addr;
> +		/*
> +		 * Since optprobe trampoline doesn't push caller on the stack,
> +		 * need to decrement 1 stack entry size
> +		 */
> +		*sp += orc->sp_offset - sizeof(long);
> +		return probe_addr;
> +	} else {
> +		return probe_addr + offset - TMPL_END_IDX;
> +	}
> +}
> +#endif

Hm, I'd like to avoid intertwining kprobes and ORC like this.

ORC unwinds other generated code by assuming the generated code uses a
frame pointer.  Could we do that here?

With CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER, unwinding works because SAVE_REGS_STRING has
ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER, but that's not going to work for ORC.

Instead of these patches, can we 'push %rbp; mov %rsp, %rbp' at the
beginning of the template and 'pop %rbp' at the end?

I guess SAVE_REGS_STRING would need to be smart enough to push the
original saved version of %rbp.  Of course then that breaks the
kretprobe_trampoline() usage, so it may need to be a separate macro.

[ Or make the same change to kretprobe_trampoline().  Then the other
  patch set wouldn't be needed either ;-) ]

Of course the downside is, when you get an interrupt during the frame
pointer setup, unwinding is broken.  But I think that's acceptable for
generated code.  We've lived with that limitation for all code, with
CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER, for many years.

Eventually we may want to have a way to register generated code (and the
ORC for it).

-- 
Josh


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-31 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-31  5:44 [RFC PATCH -tip 0/3] x86/kprobes,orc: Fix ORC unwinder to unwind stack with optimized probe Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-31  5:44 ` [RFC PATCH -tip 1/3] x86/kprobes: Add ORC information to optprobe template Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-31  5:44 ` [RFC PATCH -tip 2/3] kprobes: Add functions to find instruction buffer entry address Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-31  5:44 ` [RFC PATCH -tip 3/3] x86/kprobes,orc: Unwind optprobe trampoline correctly Masami Hiramatsu
2021-03-31 15:57   ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2021-04-01  1:44     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-04-01  2:19       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-04-01  1:54   ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210331155736.qyuph7sgabmqqmq3@treble \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).