From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <ast@fb.com>,
<daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: <andrii@kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] CO-RE relocation selftests fixes
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 16:30:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210423233058.3386115-1-andrii@kernel.org> (raw)
Lorenz Bauer noticed that core_reloc selftest has two inverted CHECK()
conditions, allowing failing tests to pass unnoticed. Fixing that opened up
few long-standing (field existence and direct memory bitfields) and one recent
failures (BTF_KIND_FLOAT relos).
This patch set fixes core_reloc selftest to capture such failures reliably in
the future. It also fixes all the newly failing tests. See individual patches
for details.
This patch set also completes a set of ASSERT_xxx() macros, so now there
should be a very little reason to use verbose and error-prone generic CHECK()
macro.
Cc: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Andrii Nakryiko (5):
selftests/bpf: add remaining ASSERT_xxx() variants
libbpf: support BTF_KIND_FLOAT during type compatibility checks in
CO-RE
selftests/bpf: fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro
selftests/bpf: fix field existence CO-RE reloc tests
selftests/bpf: fix core_reloc test runner
tools/lib/bpf/bpf_core_read.h | 16 ++++--
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 5 +-
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c | 2 +-
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_endian.c | 4 +-
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cgroup_link.c | 2 +-
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c | 51 +++++++++++--------
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfree_skb.c | 2 +-
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c | 7 +--
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/snprintf_btf.c | 4 +-
...ore_reloc_existence___err_wrong_arr_kind.c | 3 --
...loc_existence___err_wrong_arr_value_type.c | 3 --
...ore_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_kind.c | 3 --
..._core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_sz.c | 3 --
...ore_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_type.c | 3 --
..._reloc_existence___err_wrong_struct_type.c | 3 --
..._core_reloc_existence___wrong_field_defs.c | 3 ++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/core_reloc_types.h | 20 +-------
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h | 50 +++++++++++++++++-
18 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_arr_kind.c
delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_arr_value_type.c
delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_kind.c
delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_sz.c
delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_int_type.c
delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___err_wrong_struct_type.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf__core_reloc_existence___wrong_field_defs.c
--
2.30.2
next reply other threads:[~2021-04-23 23:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-23 23:30 Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2021-04-23 23:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] selftests/bpf: add remaining ASSERT_xxx() variants Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-26 8:05 ` Lorenz Bauer
2021-04-26 15:50 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-26 15:59 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-04-26 16:15 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-26 16:44 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-04-23 23:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] libbpf: support BTF_KIND_FLOAT during type compatibility checks in CO-RE Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-26 8:07 ` Lorenz Bauer
2021-04-23 23:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/5] selftests/bpf: fix BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macro Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-26 8:10 ` Lorenz Bauer
2021-04-23 23:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] selftests/bpf: fix field existence CO-RE reloc tests Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-26 8:12 ` Lorenz Bauer
2021-04-23 23:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: fix core_reloc test runner Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-26 8:16 ` Lorenz Bauer
2021-04-26 15:55 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210423233058.3386115-1-andrii@kernel.org \
--to=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=lmb@cloudflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).