bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@gmail.com>
To: syzbot+5f26f85569bd179c18ce@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, jakub@cloudflare.com,
	borisp@nvidia.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, wenjia@linux.ibm.com,
	ubraun@linux.ibm.com, daniel@iogearbox.net, guvenc@linux.ibm.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	guwen@linux.alibaba.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kafai@fb.com,
	kgraul@linux.ibm.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, songliubraving@fb.com,
	syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	yhs@fb.com, yin31149@gmail.com, 18801353760@163.com,
	paskripkin@gmail.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] net/smc: fix refcount bug in sk_psock_get (2)
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2022 16:56:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220730085654.2598-1-yin31149@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00000000000026328205e08cdbeb@google.com>

Syzkaller reports refcount bug as follows:
------------[ cut here ]------------
refcount_t: saturated; leaking memory.
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3605 at lib/refcount.c:19 refcount_warn_saturate+0xf4/0x1e0 lib/refcount.c:19
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 3605 Comm: syz-executor208 Not tainted 5.18.0-syzkaller-03023-g7e062cda7d90 #0
...
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __refcount_add_not_zero include/linux/refcount.h:163 [inline]
 __refcount_inc_not_zero include/linux/refcount.h:227 [inline]
 refcount_inc_not_zero include/linux/refcount.h:245 [inline]
 sk_psock_get+0x3bc/0x410 include/linux/skmsg.h:439
 tls_data_ready+0x6d/0x1b0 net/tls/tls_sw.c:2091
 tcp_data_ready+0x106/0x520 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:4983
 tcp_data_queue+0x25f2/0x4c90 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:5057
 tcp_rcv_state_process+0x1774/0x4e80 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:6659
 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x339/0x980 net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c:1682
 sk_backlog_rcv include/net/sock.h:1061 [inline]
 __release_sock+0x134/0x3b0 net/core/sock.c:2849
 release_sock+0x54/0x1b0 net/core/sock.c:3404
 inet_shutdown+0x1e0/0x430 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:909
 __sys_shutdown_sock net/socket.c:2331 [inline]
 __sys_shutdown_sock net/socket.c:2325 [inline]
 __sys_shutdown+0xf1/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2343
 __do_sys_shutdown net/socket.c:2351 [inline]
 __se_sys_shutdown net/socket.c:2349 [inline]
 __x64_sys_shutdown+0x50/0x70 net/socket.c:2349
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
 </TASK>

During SMC fallback process in connect syscall, kernel will
replaces TCP with SMC. In order to forward wakeup
smc socket waitqueue after fallback, kernel will sets
clcsk->sk_user_data to origin smc socket in
smc_fback_replace_callbacks().

Later, in shutdown syscall, kernel will calls
sk_psock_get(), which treats the clcsk->sk_user_data
as sk_psock type, triggering the refcnt warning.

So, the root cause is that smc and psock, both will use
sk_user_data field. So they will mismatch this field
easily.

This patch solves it by using another bit(defined as
SK_USER_DATA_NOTPSOCK) in PTRMASK, to mark whether
sk_user_data points to a sk_psock object or not.
This patch depends on a PTRMASK introduced in commit f1ff5ce2cd5e
("net, sk_msg: Clear sk_user_data pointer on clone if tagged").

Fixes: 341adeec9ada ("net/smc: Forward wakeup to smc socket waitqueue after fallback")
Fixes: a60a2b1e0af1 ("net/smc: reduce active tcp_listen workers")
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+5f26f85569bd179c18ce@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@gmail.com>
---
v1 -> v2: 
  - add bit in PTRMASK to patch the bug

 include/linux/skmsg.h |  2 +-
 include/net/sock.h    | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 net/smc/af_smc.c      |  6 ++++--
 net/smc/smc.h         |  2 +-
 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/skmsg.h b/include/linux/skmsg.h
index c5a2d6f50f25..81bfa1a33623 100644
--- a/include/linux/skmsg.h
+++ b/include/linux/skmsg.h
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static inline void sk_msg_sg_copy_clear(struct sk_msg *msg, u32 start)
 
 static inline struct sk_psock *sk_psock(const struct sock *sk)
 {
-	return rcu_dereference_sk_user_data(sk);
+	return rcu_dereference_sk_user_data_psock(sk);
 }
 
 static inline void sk_psock_set_state(struct sk_psock *psock,
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 9fa54762e077..316c0313b2bf 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -549,10 +549,17 @@ enum sk_pacing {
  * when cloning the socket. For instance, it can point to a reference
  * counted object. sk_user_data bottom bit is set if pointer must not
  * be copied.
+ *
+ * SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY   - test if pointer must not copied
+ * SK_USER_DATA_BPF      - managed by BPF
+ * SK_USER_DATA_NOTPSOCK - test if pointer points to psock
  */
 #define SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY	1UL
-#define SK_USER_DATA_BPF	2UL	/* Managed by BPF */
-#define SK_USER_DATA_PTRMASK	~(SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY | SK_USER_DATA_BPF)
+#define SK_USER_DATA_BPF	2UL
+#define SK_USER_DATA_NOTPSOCK	4UL
+#define SK_USER_DATA_PTRMASK	~(SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY | SK_USER_DATA_BPF |\
+				  SK_USER_DATA_NOTPSOCK)
+
 
 /**
  * sk_user_data_is_nocopy - Test if sk_user_data pointer must not be copied
@@ -584,6 +591,22 @@ static inline bool sk_user_data_is_nocopy(const struct sock *sk)
 			   __tmp | SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY);		\
 })
 
+/**
+ * rcu_dereference_sk_user_data_psock - return psock if sk_user_data points
+ * to the psock
+ * @sk: socket
+ */
+static inline
+struct sk_psock *rcu_dereference_sk_user_data_psock(const struct sock *sk)
+{
+	uintptr_t __tmp = (uintptr_t)rcu_dereference(__sk_user_data((sk)));
+
+	if (__tmp & SK_USER_DATA_NOTPSOCK)
+		return NULL;
+	return (struct sk_psock *)(__tmp & SK_USER_DATA_PTRMASK);
+}
+
+
 static inline
 struct net *sock_net(const struct sock *sk)
 {
diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index 433bb5a7df31..d0feccf824c8 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -812,7 +812,8 @@ static void smc_fback_replace_callbacks(struct smc_sock *smc)
 	struct sock *clcsk = smc->clcsock->sk;
 
 	write_lock_bh(&clcsk->sk_callback_lock);
-	clcsk->sk_user_data = (void *)((uintptr_t)smc | SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY);
+	clcsk->sk_user_data = (void *)((uintptr_t)smc | SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY |
+				       SK_USER_DATA_NOTPSOCK);
 
 	smc_clcsock_replace_cb(&clcsk->sk_state_change, smc_fback_state_change,
 			       &smc->clcsk_state_change);
@@ -2470,7 +2471,8 @@ static int smc_listen(struct socket *sock, int backlog)
 	 */
 	write_lock_bh(&smc->clcsock->sk->sk_callback_lock);
 	smc->clcsock->sk->sk_user_data =
-		(void *)((uintptr_t)smc | SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY);
+		(void *)((uintptr_t)smc | SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY |
+			 SK_USER_DATA_NOTPSOCK);
 	smc_clcsock_replace_cb(&smc->clcsock->sk->sk_data_ready,
 			       smc_clcsock_data_ready, &smc->clcsk_data_ready);
 	write_unlock_bh(&smc->clcsock->sk->sk_callback_lock);
diff --git a/net/smc/smc.h b/net/smc/smc.h
index 5ed765ea0c73..c24d0469d267 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc.h
+++ b/net/smc/smc.h
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static inline void smc_init_saved_callbacks(struct smc_sock *smc)
 static inline struct smc_sock *smc_clcsock_user_data(const struct sock *clcsk)
 {
 	return (struct smc_sock *)
-	       ((uintptr_t)clcsk->sk_user_data & ~SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY);
+	       ((uintptr_t)clcsk->sk_user_data & SK_USER_DATA_PTRMASK);
 }
 
 /* save target_cb in saved_cb, and replace target_cb with new_cb */
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-30  8:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-03 15:34 [syzbot] WARNING: refcount bug in sk_psock_get (2) syzbot
2022-07-09  2:46 ` [PATCH] smc: fix " Hawkins Jiawei
2022-07-09  3:06   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-09  8:36     ` Hawkins Jiawei
2022-07-11  7:21   ` Wen Gu
2022-07-13  3:10     ` Hawkins Jiawei
2022-07-13  3:33       ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-13  3:53         ` Hawkins Jiawei
2022-07-12  9:47   ` Dan Carpenter
2022-07-13  3:35     ` Hawkins Jiawei
2022-07-30  8:56 ` Hawkins Jiawei [this message]
2022-08-01  9:09   ` [PATCH v2] net/smc: " Jakub Sitnicki
2022-08-02 14:32     ` Hawkins Jiawei
2022-08-03  8:03 ` [PATCH v3] " Hawkins Jiawei
2022-08-03 11:27   ` Wen Gu
2022-08-03 12:07     ` Hawkins Jiawei
2022-08-03 12:41 ` [PATCH v4] net: " Hawkins Jiawei
2022-08-03 15:14   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-03 15:37     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-08-04  3:05       ` Hawkins Jiawei
2022-08-04 15:29         ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-05  6:28           ` Hawkins Jiawei
2022-08-05  7:36 ` [PATCH net v5 0/2] net: enhancements to sk_user_data field Hawkins Jiawei
2022-08-05  7:48   ` [PATCH net v5 1/2] net: fix refcount bug in sk_psock_get (2) Hawkins Jiawei
2022-08-05  7:48   ` [PATCH net v5 2/2] net: refactor bpf_sk_reuseport_detach() Hawkins Jiawei
2022-08-15 18:24     ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-08-05 10:29   ` [PATCH net v5 0/2] net: enhancements to sk_user_data field Jakub Sitnicki
2022-08-05 15:36     ` Hawkins Jiawei
2022-08-11  5:30   ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220730085654.2598-1-yin31149@gmail.com \
    --to=yin31149@gmail.com \
    --cc=18801353760@163.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=borisp@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=guvenc@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=paskripkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=syzbot+5f26f85569bd179c18ce@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=ubraun@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).