bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>, <keescook@chromium.org>,
	<brauner@kernel.org>, <lennart@poettering.net>,
	<cyphar@cyphar.com>, <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 03/18] selftests/bpf: add BPF_TOKEN_CREATE test
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 07:59:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230602150011.1657856-4-andrii@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230602150011.1657856-1-andrii@kernel.org>

Add a subtest validating BPF_TOKEN_CREATE command, pinning/getting BPF
token in/from BPF FS, and creating derived BPF tokens using token_fd
parameter.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/token.c  | 95 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/token.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/token.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/token.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..fe78b558d697
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/token.c
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2023 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+#include "linux/bpf.h"
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include <bpf/btf.h>
+#include "cap_helpers.h"
+
+static int drop_priv_caps(__u64 *old_caps)
+{
+	return cap_disable_effective((1ULL << CAP_BPF) |
+				     (1ULL << CAP_PERFMON) |
+				     (1ULL << CAP_NET_ADMIN) |
+				     (1ULL << CAP_SYS_ADMIN), old_caps);
+}
+
+static int restore_priv_caps(__u64 old_caps)
+{
+	return cap_enable_effective(old_caps, NULL);
+}
+
+#define TOKEN_PATH "/sys/fs/bpf/test_token"
+
+static void subtest_token_create(void)
+{
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_token_create_opts, opts);
+	int token_fd = 0, limited_token_fd = 0, tmp_fd = 0, err;
+	__u64 old_caps = 0;
+
+	/* create BPF token which allows creating derived BPF tokens */
+	opts.allowed_cmds = 1ULL << BPF_TOKEN_CREATE;
+	token_fd = bpf_token_create(&opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_GT(token_fd, 0, "token_create"))
+		return;
+
+	/* check that IGNORE_UNKNOWN_CMDS flag is respected */
+	opts.flags = BPF_F_TOKEN_IGNORE_UNKNOWN_CMDS;
+	opts.allowed_cmds = ~0ULL; /* any current and future cmd is allowed */
+	tmp_fd = bpf_token_create(&opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_GT(token_fd, 0, "token_create_future_proof"))
+		return;
+	close(tmp_fd);
+	tmp_fd = 0;
+
+	/* validate pinning and getting works as expected */
+	err = bpf_obj_pin(token_fd, TOKEN_PATH);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "token_pin"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	tmp_fd = bpf_obj_get(TOKEN_PATH);
+	ASSERT_GT(tmp_fd, 0, "token_get");
+	close(tmp_fd);
+	tmp_fd = 0;
+	unlink(TOKEN_PATH);
+
+	/* drop privileges to test token_fd passing */
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(drop_priv_caps(&old_caps), "drop_caps"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	/* unprivileged BPF_TOKEN_CREATE should fail */
+	tmp_fd = bpf_token_create(NULL);
+	if (!ASSERT_LT(tmp_fd, 0, "token_create_unpriv_fail"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	/* unprivileged BPF_TOKEN_CREATE with associated BPF token succeeds */
+	opts.flags = 0;
+	opts.allowed_cmds = 0; /* ask for BPF token which doesn't allow new tokens */
+	opts.token_fd = token_fd;
+	limited_token_fd = bpf_token_create(&opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_GT(limited_token_fd, 0, "token_create_limited"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	/* creating yet another token using "limited" BPF token should fail */
+	opts.flags = 0;
+	opts.allowed_cmds = 0;
+	opts.token_fd = limited_token_fd;
+	tmp_fd = bpf_token_create(&opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_LT(tmp_fd, 0, "token_create_from_lim_fail"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+cleanup:
+	if (tmp_fd)
+		close(tmp_fd);
+	if (token_fd)
+		close(token_fd);
+	if (limited_token_fd)
+		close(limited_token_fd);
+	if (old_caps)
+		ASSERT_OK(restore_priv_caps(old_caps), "restore_caps");
+}
+
+void test_token(void)
+{
+	if (test__start_subtest("token_create"))
+		subtest_token_create();
+}
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-02 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-02 14:59 [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 00/18] BPF token Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 14:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 01/18] bpf: introduce BPF token object Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 17:41   ` kernel test robot
2023-06-02 20:41   ` kernel test robot
2023-06-03  1:32   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-05 20:56     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-05 21:48       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-05 23:00         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-06 16:58           ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-06-06 17:04             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 14:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 02/18] libbpf: add bpf_token_create() API Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 14:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2023-06-02 14:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 04/18] bpf: move unprivileged checks into map_create() and bpf_prog_load() Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 14:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 05/18] bpf: inline map creation logic in map_create() function Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 14:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 06/18] bpf: centralize permissions checks for all BPF map types Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 07/18] bpf: add BPF token support to BPF_MAP_CREATE command Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 08/18] libbpf: add BPF token support to bpf_map_create() API Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 09/18] selftests/bpf: add BPF token-enabled test for BPF_MAP_CREATE command Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 10/18] bpf: add BPF token support to BPF_BTF_LOAD command Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 11/18] libbpf: add BPF token support to bpf_btf_load() API Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 12/18] selftests/bpf: add BPF token-enabled BPF_BTF_LOAD selftest Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 13/18] bpf: keep BPF_PROG_LOAD permission checks clear of validations Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 14/18] bpf: add BPF token support to BPF_PROG_LOAD command Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 15/18] bpf: take into account BPF token when fetching helper protos Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 18:46   ` kernel test robot
2023-06-02 20:07     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 16/18] bpf: consistenly use BPF token throughout BPF verifier logic Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 17/18] libbpf: add BPF token support to bpf_prog_load() API Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:00 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 18/18] selftests/bpf: add BPF token-enabled BPF_PROG_LOAD tests Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-02 15:55 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next 00/18] BPF token Casey Schaufler
2023-06-05 20:41   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-05 22:26     ` Casey Schaufler
2023-06-05 23:12       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-06  0:05         ` Casey Schaufler
2023-06-06 16:38           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-06 20:13             ` Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230602150011.1657856-4-andrii@kernel.org \
    --to=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=lennart@poettering.net \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).