From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C14297F for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2023 02:53:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pf1-x442.google.com (mail-pf1-x442.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::442]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FE89EE; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 19:53:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x442.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-665a16cdd97so1321360b3a.3; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 19:53:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1686624786; x=1689216786; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zU1aUlsiWsl4IlJv9hQedeNTa8fO5CzZWJlrdg0Vjj0=; b=Q8Cf9Vbi1aDL8NbhnHwzvWRizdpXWyaQGltBeXKxjvlFU9J4x9suwGZeyBHczYUZ3t YSesIXdN6fX9wOrZRc2NbCG/ERlhqF5y3P7Ooo53LCWGZPbS/Bpk3ny2fEDfZyG29VpY pEc/iZgPx6iHz+ka61bnMegPR1eq3ASMlokt5umlUK/GhYGmpPJ6ILguId3JGn0IDbMR 5GMYtbHde+qEgzWN2GH+D3XPKTiqp5jKMIMGc59J2SVIxIMYO/2q6nMpslJpl151XrV4 fsn2s6PiL+GvW68ZzylQunrEvX7bEx/JorLhxf+1+wXL+v68JvpZ1uDACtk4X5x1OztW cDsQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686624786; x=1689216786; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=zU1aUlsiWsl4IlJv9hQedeNTa8fO5CzZWJlrdg0Vjj0=; b=QqiVeeaoinGop3/nUTQwKwn3kbelFF+KBvdTshIlGD3jMAM4XwBvvvbndhHtNB5bUf fXKFUX8XXtercDYG5qGKy8upYP/KcJvrFOjJicCQ3nzW/zfF+RK9LcY6RLc7MyCIQIEv gly2Js97LZfcUALBu2BLWITGEnG2CqBCeTgiXeuM80SJnhWli2q7XOsCrDqMvT+X74e9 dttnlu6aYJI6UkFarGhbgQdI/oQ4MVT8+a4ST3L3lly9fF1fZBb6kqidI322bNbexxWR WHZz1WviFZgtYS0U9zmPclwH8xPYRxvW0D1dVJq9Zy0o2seMb0g42fFVpAEh5iJm4yeP n05A== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDz5K7xtzDcPQjILwhuu6qbxbu+wo3mB1G01t+RmffeMUGZ6yTx7 D6x1Ig+zEf0OKOUK0oV3FS0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4zidIJjxVF/YXPHR+9qFCmk26mh453EjtCOTsKM3qzTFmSIFN38UTMQpxO9V4Lq1gjkkEciA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:218c:b0:65b:38b2:8d4b with SMTP id h12-20020a056a00218c00b0065b38b28d4bmr13788265pfi.29.1686624785671; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 19:53:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([203.205.141.85]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v65-20020a632f44000000b00543e9e17207sm8240207pgv.30.2023.06.12.19.53.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 12 Jun 2023 19:53:04 -0700 (PDT) From: menglong8.dong@gmail.com X-Google-Original-From: imagedong@tencent.com To: yhs@meta.com, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, benbjiang@tencent.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Menglong Dong Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/3] bpf, x86: allow function arguments up to 12 for TRACING Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 10:52:23 +0800 Message-Id: <20230613025226.3167956-1-imagedong@tencent.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net From: Menglong Dong For now, the BPF program of type BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING can only be used on the kernel functions whose arguments count less than 6. This is not friendly at all, as too many functions have arguments count more than 6. According to the current kernel version, below is a statistics of the function arguments count: argument count | function count 7 | 704 8 | 270 9 | 84 10 | 47 11 | 47 12 | 27 13 | 22 14 | 5 15 | 0 16 | 1 Therefore, let's enhance it by increasing the function arguments count allowed in arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(), for now, only x86_64. In the 1st patch, we clean garbage value in upper bytes of the trampoline when we store the arguments from regs into stack. In the 2nd patch, we make arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() support to copy function arguments in stack for x86 arch. Therefore, the maximum arguments can be up to MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS for FENTRY and FEXIT. Meanwhile, we clean the potentian garbage value when we copy the arguments on-stack. And the 3rd patches are for the testcases of the this series. Changes since v4: - consider the case of the struct in arguments can't be hold by regs - add comment for some code - add testcases for MODIFY_RETURN - rebase to the latest Changes since v3: - try make the stack pointer 16-byte aligned. Not sure if I'm right :) - introduce clean_garbage() to clean the grabage when argument count is 7 - use different data type in bpf_testmod_fentry_test{7,12} - add testcase for grabage values in ctx Changes since v2: - keep MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS still - clean garbage value in upper bytes in the 2nd patch - move bpf_fentry_test{7,12} to bpf_testmod.c and rename them to bpf_testmod_fentry_test{7,12} meanwhile in the 3rd patch Changes since v1: - change the maximun function arguments to 14 from 12 - add testcases (Jiri Olsa) - instead EMIT4 with EMIT3_off32 for "lea" to prevent overflow Menglong Dong (3): bpf, x86: clean garbage values when store args from regs into stack bpf, x86: allow function arguments up to 12 for TRACING selftests/bpf: add testcase for TRACING with 6+ arguments arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 232 ++++++++++++++---- net/bpf/test_run.c | 23 +- .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 45 +++- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c | 4 +- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c | 2 + .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_test.c | 2 + .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/modify_return.c | 20 +- .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c | 52 ++++ .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_test.c | 54 ++++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/modify_return.c | 40 +++ 10 files changed, 424 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) -- 2.40.1