bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: menglong8.dong@gmail.com
To: daniel@iogearbox.net, yhs@meta.com, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Cc: ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	song@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com,
	jolsa@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v8 0/3] bpf, x86: allow function arguments up to 12 for TRACING
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 19:53:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230627115319.13128-1-imagedong@tencent.com> (raw)

From: Menglong Dong <imagedong@tencent.com>

For now, the BPF program of type BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING can only be used
on the kernel functions whose arguments count less than or equal to 6, if
not considering '> 8 bytes' struct argument. This is not friendly at all,
as too many functions have arguments count more than 6. According to the
current kernel version, below is a statistics of the function arguments
count:

argument count | function count
7              | 704
8              | 270
9              | 84
10             | 47
11             | 47
12             | 27
13             | 22
14             | 5
15             | 0
16             | 1

Therefore, let's enhance it by increasing the function arguments count
allowed in arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(), for now, only x86_64.

In the 1st patch, we save/restore regs with BPF_DW size to make the code
in save_regs()/restore_regs() simpler.

In the 2nd patch, we make arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() support to copy
function arguments in stack for x86 arch. Therefore, the maximum
arguments can be up to MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS for FENTRY, FEXIT and
MODIFY_RETURN. Meanwhile, we clean the potential garbage value when we
copy the arguments on-stack.

And the 3rd patch is for the testcases of the this series.

Changes since v7:
- split the testcases, and add fentry_many_args/fexit_many_args to
  DENYLIST.aarch64 in 3rd patch

Changes since v6:
- somit nits from commit message and comment in the 1st patch
- remove the inline in get_nr_regs() in the 1st patch
- rename some function and various in the 1st patch

Changes since v5:
- adjust the commit log of the 1st patch, avoiding confusing people that
  bugs exist in current code
- introduce get_nr_regs() to get the space that used to pass args on
  stack correct in the 2nd patch
- add testcases to tracing_struct.c instead of fentry_test.c and
  fexit_test.c

Changes since v4:
- consider the case of the struct in arguments can't be hold by regs
- add comment for some code
- add testcases for MODIFY_RETURN
- rebase to the latest

Changes since v3:
- try make the stack pointer 16-byte aligned. Not sure if I'm right :)
- introduce clean_garbage() to clean the grabage when argument count is 7
- use different data type in bpf_testmod_fentry_test{7,12}
- add testcase for grabage values in ctx

Changes since v2:
- keep MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS still
- clean garbage value in upper bytes in the 2nd patch
- move bpf_fentry_test{7,12} to bpf_testmod.c and rename them to
  bpf_testmod_fentry_test{7,12} meanwhile in the 3rd patch

Changes since v1:
- change the maximun function arguments to 14 from 12
- add testcases (Jiri Olsa)
- instead EMIT4 with EMIT3_off32 for "lea" to prevent overflow

Menglong Dong (3):
  bpf, x86: save/restore regs with BPF_DW size
  bpf, x86: allow function arguments up to 12 for TRACING
  selftests/bpf: add testcase for TRACING with 6+ arguments

 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c                   | 246 +++++++++++++++---
 net/bpf/test_run.c                            |  23 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64  |   2 +
 .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c   |  49 +++-
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_test.c    |  43 ++-
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_test.c     |  43 ++-
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/modify_return.c  |  20 +-
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c |  19 ++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_many_args.c    |  39 +++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_many_args.c     |  40 +++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/modify_return.c       |  40 +++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c      |  54 ++++
 12 files changed, 561 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_many_args.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fexit_many_args.c

-- 
2.40.1


             reply	other threads:[~2023-06-27 11:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-27 11:53 menglong8.dong [this message]
2023-06-27 11:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 1/3] bpf, x86: save/restore regs with BPF_DW size menglong8.dong
2023-06-27 11:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 2/3] bpf, x86: allow function arguments up to 12 for TRACING menglong8.dong
2023-06-27 11:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next v8 3/3] selftests/bpf: add testcase for TRACING with 6+ arguments menglong8.dong
2023-07-05  1:47   ` Menglong Dong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230627115319.13128-1-imagedong@tencent.com \
    --to=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=imagedong@tencent.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@meta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).