From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-oi1-f177.google.com (mail-oi1-f177.google.com [209.85.167.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5505EA50 for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 10:07:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.177 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708855630; cv=none; b=G+ntoDd4fme+i4+g6RaIxWPoiTrentZJ2z/z5qJIFVU+6UnzjgZhptyLivrXH4V8LwTz5txQ2+8wNCo3wO4ieL0xBIpyEPzQqEv8TvuYadnVaCp25vd0wKQ1PGVUvstbN6b7rBY6zLntq7tVdHBHKf/QmCflz+lpIE5pqBwMeJw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708855630; c=relaxed/simple; bh=P5BD3nAEerbKfteBlsYM2K4PeJ0bQo6Ffg/q+amsGOo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=HondwUoLQ8OdI2sqcgnunLuoOhAKGn2wJu4sv1IVLhsrSXO27eux7NYKwpLCA0E2rQ72Eku4n/XKX4WthxGvPOkTn03HCPeDINti94qbl2S9qiEH2oHPnn/NXaztIy5p/OSCpx79eL3XUUJNdIWVuyPJ78di+gOF+wSYgdxr0xE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=JpRsmrHh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.177 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="JpRsmrHh" Received: by mail-oi1-f177.google.com with SMTP id 5614622812f47-3c132695f1bso1344974b6e.2 for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 02:07:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1708855628; x=1709460428; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vekXwb3oxruqG86Lc25kSlZc7qGC3yPCrP/NRyv72aQ=; b=JpRsmrHhDVAtg+RouRKQjFzvKrqPAvKO9cOvkTQE4PvZhyvEOLmQT6rXq0eJuU1vnq b/B4B/x1qS12/da2GH0Fqp7BngqHpiCPaDwZAhVkSCqvhBsNX43Tauv+LplD1JXpPTB3 8P8k9R2ltsAcDSfAtnP0qVhUS5WLTVyd5uUwPMjp176Mz8NRBaxKgOJl6JK9TyORyxsR OFUNlUWcikRa/ALc2yLkNBu9QTRbXX5CPBegzfmvx9V7S/tcKSpz5hnm0R/eFsraxRfS TbxDPivqmMa4qiSARPIj1Ew87PA+tcp2xxmPiQ4VVT8QLTJKoXgbEUq4gcXzpBM9EP5d 4Q5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708855628; x=1709460428; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=vekXwb3oxruqG86Lc25kSlZc7qGC3yPCrP/NRyv72aQ=; b=p2gYVDUtQrPkzdopdLY7BvATNQ6WX1sFL15oIXdI95uhFq4ACZWYTU6aQTAUGHYSkw 5GklctgT+T0RiiBxui5hSiw9SXB3oQxV7Pad160qm5K490kwXh+qXOi79c45L8tBgVkM 6kPsgUO6zxbD4sT3+l/ChrJIPQnpeaWLtJYCrm1SA7luonkKCUUAkiXCyq448vUYv8h3 DWi23uSeFQ9MZb3IB39Vl0xL2+b4q2SLy8COrZRKPuYUqpBbLuCikUXw/T8RYlCO3V5d Avizym0tC71s1sxNK0YVsAFPCMOj6HKFMoQyB2Mi8i1/7K26nP6f3Mz825hTlQB3A75x KJVw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxqck7C+uhcm1XmabwbxXIiOY7pMVlbuaZ8rKwv/qWMB6uPhhm+ TOunpHwf+xg3xN5oNekxBsHMgU0DECsz1UDsA8fWz4JE8SAfWaL0 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEfqczSYUp5gKpiGWmwBF/LSyWYF+V1/x0OUz+Z2nWvpIDPVtzeWQztTtXaPA98ClTWa23N1A== X-Received: by 2002:aca:1107:0:b0:3c1:6807:2809 with SMTP id 7-20020aca1107000000b003c168072809mr4615034oir.59.1708855628484; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 02:07:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([39.144.104.176]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f26-20020aa79d9a000000b006e1464e71f9sm2119775pfq.47.2024.02.25.02.07.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 25 Feb 2024 02:07:07 -0800 (PST) From: Yafang Shao To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Yafang Shao Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Add a generic bits iterator Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 18:06:35 +0800 Message-Id: <20240225100637.48394-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.1 (Apple Git-130) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Three new kfuncs, namely bpf_iter_bits_{new,next,destroy}, have been added for the new bpf_iter_bits functionality. These kfuncs enable the iteration of the bits from a given address and a given number of bits. - bpf_iter_bits_new Initialize a new bits iterator for a given memory area. Due to the limitation of bpf memalloc, the max number of bits to be iterated over is (4096 * 8). - bpf_iter_bits_next Get the next bit in a bpf_iter_bits - bpf_iter_bits_destroy Destroy a bpf_iter_bits The bits iterator can be used in any context and on any address. In our specific use case, we leverage the cgroup iterator to traverse percpu data, subsequently exposing it to userspace through a seq file. Refer to example in patch #2 for the usage. Changes: - v1->v2: - Simplify the CPU number verification code to avoid the failure on s390x (Eduard) - bpf: Add bpf_iter_cpumask https://lwn.net/Articles/961104/ - bpf: Add new bpf helper bpf_for_each_cpu https://lwn.net/Articles/939939/ Yafang Shao (2): bpf: Add bits iterator selftests/bpf: Add selftest for bits iter kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 100 +++++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bits_iter.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++ .../bpf/progs/test_bits_iter_failure.c | 54 +++++++ .../bpf/progs/test_bits_iter_success.c | 112 +++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 398 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bits_iter.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bits_iter_failure.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bits_iter_success.c -- 2.39.1