From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@cloudflare.com,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 5/8] bpf: Allow selecting reuseport socket from a SOCKMAP
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2019 20:17:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ddb55c87d06c_79e12b0ab99325bc69@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191125012440.crbufwpokttx67du@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 12:07:48PM +0100, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> > SOCKMAP now supports storing references to listening sockets. Nothing keeps
> > us from using it as an array of sockets to select from in SK_REUSEPORT
> > programs.
> >
> > Whitelist the map type with the BPF helper for selecting socket. However,
> > impose a restriction that the selected socket needs to be a listening TCP
> > socket or a bound UDP socket (connected or not).
> >
> > The only other map type that works with the BPF reuseport helper,
> > REUSEPORT_SOCKARRAY, has a corresponding check in its update operation
> > handler.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
> > ---
[...]
> > diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> > index 49ded4a7588a..e3fb77353248 100644
> > --- a/net/core/filter.c
> > +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> > @@ -8723,6 +8723,8 @@ BPF_CALL_4(sk_select_reuseport, struct sk_reuseport_kern *, reuse_kern,
> > selected_sk = map->ops->map_lookup_elem(map, key);
> > if (!selected_sk)
> > return -ENOENT;
> > + if (!sock_flag(selected_sk, SOCK_RCU_FREE))
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> hmm. I wonder whether this breaks existing users...
There is already this check in reuseport_array_update_check()
/*
* sk must be hashed (i.e. listening in the TCP case or binded
* in the UDP case) and
* it must also be a SO_REUSEPORT sk (i.e. reuse cannot be NULL).
*
* Also, sk will be used in bpf helper that is protected by
* rcu_read_lock().
*/
if (!sock_flag(nsk, SOCK_RCU_FREE) || !sk_hashed(nsk) || !nsk_reuse)
return -EINVAL;
So I believe it should not cause any problems with existing users. Perhaps
we could consolidate the checks a bit or move it into the update paths if we
wanted. I assume Jakub was just ensuring we don't get here with SOCK_RCU_FREE
set from any of the new paths now. I'll let him answer though.
> Martin,
> what do you think?
More eyes the better.
> Could you also take a look at other patches too?
> In particular patch 7?
>
Agreed would be good to give 7/8 a look I'm not too familiar with the
selftests there.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-25 4:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-23 11:07 [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] Extend SOCKMAP to store listening sockets Jakub Sitnicki
2019-11-23 11:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/8] bpf, sockmap: Return socket cookie on lookup from syscall Jakub Sitnicki
2019-11-24 5:32 ` John Fastabend
2019-11-23 11:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/8] bpf, sockmap: Let all kernel-land lookup values in SOCKMAP Jakub Sitnicki
2019-11-24 5:35 ` John Fastabend
2019-11-23 11:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/8] bpf, sockmap: Allow inserting listening TCP sockets into SOCKMAP Jakub Sitnicki
2019-11-24 5:38 ` John Fastabend
2019-11-23 11:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/8] bpf, sockmap: Don't let child socket inherit psock or its ops on copy Jakub Sitnicki
2019-11-24 5:56 ` John Fastabend
2019-11-25 22:38 ` Martin Lau
2019-11-26 15:54 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2019-11-26 17:16 ` Martin Lau
2019-11-26 18:36 ` Jakub Sitnicki
[not found] ` <87sglsfdda.fsf@cloudflare.com>
2019-12-11 17:20 ` Martin Lau
2019-12-12 11:27 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2019-12-12 19:23 ` Martin Lau
2019-12-17 15:06 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2019-11-26 18:43 ` John Fastabend
2019-11-27 22:18 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2019-11-23 11:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/8] bpf: Allow selecting reuseport socket from a SOCKMAP Jakub Sitnicki
2019-11-24 5:57 ` John Fastabend
2019-11-25 1:24 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-11-25 4:17 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2019-11-25 10:40 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2019-11-25 22:07 ` Martin Lau
2019-11-26 14:30 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2019-11-26 19:03 ` Martin Lau
2019-11-27 21:34 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2019-11-23 11:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/8] libbpf: Recognize SK_REUSEPORT programs from section name Jakub Sitnicki
2019-11-24 5:57 ` John Fastabend
2019-11-23 11:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/8] selftests/bpf: Extend SK_REUSEPORT tests to cover SOCKMAP Jakub Sitnicki
2019-11-24 6:00 ` John Fastabend
2019-11-25 22:30 ` Martin Lau
2019-11-26 14:32 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2019-12-12 10:30 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2019-11-23 11:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next 8/8] selftests/bpf: Tests for SOCKMAP holding listening sockets Jakub Sitnicki
2019-11-24 6:04 ` John Fastabend
2019-11-24 6:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] Extend SOCKMAP to store " John Fastabend
2019-11-25 9:22 ` Jakub Sitnicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5ddb55c87d06c_79e12b0ab99325bc69@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).