bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, ast@kernel.org, song@kernel.org,
	jonathan.lemon@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [bpf PATCH v2 1/8] bpf: sockmap/tls, during free we may call tcp_bpf_unhash() in loop
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 14:29:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pnfnscvl.fsf@cloudflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200111061206.8028-2-john.fastabend@gmail.com>

On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 07:11 AM CET, John Fastabend wrote:
> When a sockmap is free'd and a socket in the map is enabled with tls
> we tear down the bpf context on the socket, the psock struct and state,
> and then call tcp_update_ulp(). The tcp_update_ulp() call is to inform
> the tls stack it needs to update its saved sock ops so that when the tls
> socket is later destroyed it doesn't try to call the now destroyed psock
> hooks.
>
> This is about keeping stacked ULPs in good shape so they always have
> the right set of stacked ops.
>
> However, recently unhash() hook was removed from TLS side. But, the
> sockmap/bpf side is not doing any extra work to update the unhash op
> when is torn down instead expecting TLS side to manage it. So both
> TLS and sockmap believe the other side is managing the op and instead
> no one updates the hook so it continues to point at tcp_bpf_unhash().
> When unhash hook is called we call tcp_bpf_unhash() which detects the
> psock has already been destroyed and calls sk->sk_prot_unhash() which
> calls tcp_bpf_unhash() yet again and so on looping and hanging the core.
>
> To fix have sockmap tear down logic fixup the stale pointer.
>
> Fixes: 5d92e631b8be ("net/tls: partially revert fix transition through disconnect with close")
> Reported-by: syzbot+83979935eb6304f8cd46@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/skmsg.h | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/skmsg.h b/include/linux/skmsg.h
> index ef7031f8a304..b6afe01f8592 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skmsg.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skmsg.h
> @@ -358,6 +358,7 @@ static inline void sk_psock_update_proto(struct sock *sk,
>  static inline void sk_psock_restore_proto(struct sock *sk,
>  					  struct sk_psock *psock)
>  {
> +	sk->sk_prot->unhash = psock->saved_unhash;

We could also restore it from psock->sk_proto->unhash if we were not
NULL'ing on first call, right?

I've been wondering what is the purpose of having psock->saved_unhash
and psock->saved_close if we have the whole sk->sk_prot saved in
psock->sk_proto.

>  	sk->sk_write_space = psock->saved_write_space;
>
>  	if (psock->sk_proto) {

Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-13 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-11  6:11 [bpf PATCH v2 0/8] Fixes for sockmap/tls from more complex BPF progs John Fastabend
2020-01-11  6:11 ` [bpf PATCH v2 1/8] bpf: sockmap/tls, during free we may call tcp_bpf_unhash() in loop John Fastabend
2020-01-13 13:29   ` Jakub Sitnicki [this message]
2020-01-14  3:19     ` John Fastabend
2020-01-11  6:12 ` [bpf PATCH v2 2/8] bpf: sockmap, ensure sock lock held during tear down John Fastabend
2020-02-05 17:55   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-02-06  5:51     ` John Fastabend
2020-02-06 12:26       ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-02-06 19:04         ` John Fastabend
2020-01-11  6:12 ` [bpf PATCH v2 3/8] bpf: sockmap/tls, push write_space updates through ulp updates John Fastabend
2020-01-12  1:00   ` Jonathan Lemon
2020-01-13 13:59   ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-01-11  6:12 ` [bpf PATCH v2 4/8] bpf: sockmap, skmsg helper overestimates push, pull, and pop bounds John Fastabend
2020-01-11  6:12 ` [bpf PATCH v2 5/8] bpf: sockmap/tls, msg_push_data may leave end mark in place John Fastabend
2020-01-11  6:12 ` [bpf PATCH v2 6/8] bpf: sockmap/tls, tls_sw can create a plaintext buf > encrypt buf John Fastabend
2020-01-11  6:12 ` [bpf PATCH v2 7/8] bpf: sockmap/tls, skmsg can have wrapped skmsg that needs extra chaining John Fastabend
2020-01-11  6:12 ` [bpf PATCH v2 8/8] bpf: sockmap/tls, fix pop data with SK_DROP return code John Fastabend
2020-01-15 22:37 ` [bpf PATCH v2 0/8] Fixes for sockmap/tls from more complex BPF progs Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pnfnscvl.fsf@cloudflare.com \
    --to=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).