bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: "Jakub Kicinski" <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>,
	"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Cc: "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@intel.com>,
	"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
	bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] net: xdp: refactor XDP_QUERY_PROG{,_HW} to netdev
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 10:55:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pno935yb.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190522140447.53468a2a@cakuba.netronome.com>

Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> writes:

> On Wed, 22 May 2019 22:54:44 +0200, Björn Töpel wrote:
>> > > Now, the same commands give:
>> > >
>> > >   # ip link set dev eth0 xdp obj foo.o sec main
>> > >   # ip link set dev eth0 xdpgeneric off
>> > >   Error: native and generic XDP can't be active at the same time.  
>> >
>> > I'm not clear why this change is necessary? It is a change in
>> > behaviour, and if anything returning ENOENT would seem cleaner
>> > in this case.
>> 
>> To me, the existing behavior was non-intuitive. If most people *don't*
>> agree, I'll remove this change. So, what do people think about this?
>> :-)
>
> Having things start to fail after they were successful/ignored
> is one of those ABI breakage types Linux and netdev usually takes
> pretty seriously, unfortunately.  Especially when motivation is 
> "it's more intuitive" :)
>
> If nobody chimes in please break out this behaviour change into 
> a commit of its own.

Björn and I already had this discussion off-list. I think we ended up
concluding that since it's not changing kernel *behaviour*, but just
making an existing error explicit, it might be acceptable from an ABI
breakage PoV. And I'd generally prefer explicit errors over silent
failures.

But yeah, can totally see why it could also be considered a breaking
change...

-Toke

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-23  8:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-22 12:53 [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] net: xdp: refactor the XDP_QUERY_PROG and XDP_QUERY_PROG_HW code Björn Töpel
2019-05-22 12:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] net: xdp: refactor XDP_QUERY_PROG{,_HW} to netdev Björn Töpel
2019-05-22 13:02   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-05-22 18:32   ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-05-22 20:54     ` Björn Töpel
2019-05-22 21:04       ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-05-22 21:12         ` Björn Töpel
2019-05-23  8:55         ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2019-05-28 17:06     ` Björn Töpel
2019-05-28 18:41       ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-05-23  5:47   ` Saeed Mahameed
2019-05-23  6:35     ` Björn Töpel
2019-05-22 12:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] net: xdp: remove XDP_QUERY_PROG{,_HW} Björn Töpel
2019-05-22 17:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] net: xdp: refactor the XDP_QUERY_PROG and XDP_QUERY_PROG_HW code Jakub Kicinski
2019-05-22 20:48   ` Björn Töpel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pno935yb.fsf@toke.dk \
    --to=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@gmail.com \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).