bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
To: Gilad Reti <gilad.reti@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/bpf: add verifier test for PTR_TO_MEM spill
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:55:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACYkzJ69serkHRymzDEAcQ-_KAdHA+RxP4qpAwzGmppWUxYeQQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210112091545.10535-1-gilad.reti@gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:16 AM Gilad Reti <gilad.reti@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Add test to check that the verifier is able to recognize spilling of
> PTR_TO_MEM registers.
>

It would be nice to have some explanation of what the test does to
recognize the spilling of the PTR_TO_MEM registers in the commit
log as well.

Would it be possible to augment an existing test_progs
program like tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ringbuf.c to test
this functionality?



> The patch was partially contibuted by CyberArk Software, Inc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gilad Reti <gilad.reti@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c   | 12 +++++++-
>  .../selftests/bpf/verifier/spill_fill.c       | 30 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> index 777a81404fdb..f8569f04064b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
>  #define MAX_INSNS      BPF_MAXINSNS
>  #define MAX_TEST_INSNS 1000000
>  #define MAX_FIXUPS     8
> -#define MAX_NR_MAPS    20
> +#define MAX_NR_MAPS    21
>  #define MAX_TEST_RUNS  8
>  #define POINTER_VALUE  0xcafe4all
>  #define TEST_DATA_LEN  64
> @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ struct bpf_test {
>         int fixup_sk_storage_map[MAX_FIXUPS];
>         int fixup_map_event_output[MAX_FIXUPS];
>         int fixup_map_reuseport_array[MAX_FIXUPS];
> +       int fixup_map_ringbuf[MAX_FIXUPS];
>         const char *errstr;
>         const char *errstr_unpriv;
>         uint32_t insn_processed;
> @@ -640,6 +641,7 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
>         int *fixup_sk_storage_map = test->fixup_sk_storage_map;
>         int *fixup_map_event_output = test->fixup_map_event_output;
>         int *fixup_map_reuseport_array = test->fixup_map_reuseport_array;
> +       int *fixup_map_ringbuf = test->fixup_map_ringbuf;
>
>         if (test->fill_helper) {
>                 test->fill_insns = calloc(MAX_TEST_INSNS, sizeof(struct bpf_insn));
> @@ -817,6 +819,14 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
>                         fixup_map_reuseport_array++;
>                 } while (*fixup_map_reuseport_array);
>         }
> +       if (*fixup_map_ringbuf) {
> +               map_fds[20] = create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_RINGBUF, 0,
> +                                          0, 4096);
> +               do {
> +                       prog[*fixup_map_ringbuf].imm = map_fds[20];
> +                       fixup_map_ringbuf++;
> +               } while (*fixup_map_ringbuf);
> +       }
>  }
>
>  struct libcap {
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spill_fill.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spill_fill.c
> index 45d43bf82f26..1833b6c730dd 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spill_fill.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spill_fill.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,36 @@
>         .result = ACCEPT,
>         .result_unpriv = ACCEPT,
>  },
> +{
> +       "check valid spill/fill, ptr to mem",
> +       .insns = {
> +       /* reserve 8 byte ringbuf memory */
> +       BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
> +       BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
> +       BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 8),
> +       BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
> +       BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_ringbuf_reserve),
> +       /* store a pointer to the reserved memory in R6 */
> +       BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
> +       /* check whether the reservation was successful */
> +       BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 6),
> +       /* spill R6(mem) into the stack */
> +       BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_6, -8),
> +       /* fill it back in R7 */
> +       BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_10, -8),
> +       /* should be able to access *(R7) = 0 */
> +       BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_7, 0, 0),
> +       /* submit the reserved rungbuf memory */
> +       BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_7),
> +       BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0),
> +       BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_ringbuf_submit),
> +       BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
> +       BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> +       },
> +       .fixup_map_ringbuf = { 1 },
> +       .result = ACCEPT,
> +       .result_unpriv = ACCEPT,
> +},
>  {
>         "check corrupted spill/fill",
>         .insns = {
> --
> 2.27.0
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-12 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-12  9:15 [PATCH 2/2] selftests/bpf: add verifier test for PTR_TO_MEM spill Gilad Reti
2021-01-12 14:55 ` KP Singh [this message]
2021-01-12 15:35   ` Gilad Reti
2021-01-12 15:43     ` Daniel Borkmann
2021-01-12 16:17       ` KP Singh
2021-01-12 16:24         ` Gilad Reti
2021-01-12 16:59       ` Yonghong Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACYkzJ69serkHRymzDEAcQ-_KAdHA+RxP4qpAwzGmppWUxYeQQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=gilad.reti@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).