bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>
Cc: "Magnus Karlsson" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@intel.com>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Network Development" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
	"Maxim Mikityanskiy" <maximmi@mellanox.com>,
	bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	bruce.richardson@intel.com, ciara.loftus@intel.com,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>,
	"Ye Xiaolong" <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>,
	"Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>,
	"Kevin Laatz" <kevin.laatz@intel.com>,
	ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, Kiran <kiran.patil@intel.com>,
	axboe@kernel.dk, "Fijalkowski,
	Maciej" <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
	"Maciej Fijalkowski" <maciejromanfijalkowski@gmail.com>,
	intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/8] i40e: add support for AF_XDP need_wakeup feature
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 16:59:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ8uoz0Tnb=i-LkGqLU87be9BuYqxmu2pN1Mte0UEWA2+f8bTQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B2C7C21-4AAC-4126-A31D-58A61D941709@gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 4:48 PM Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 14 Aug 2019, at 0:27, Magnus Karlsson wrote:
>
> > This patch adds support for the need_wakeup feature of AF_XDP. If the
> > application has told the kernel that it might sleep using the new bind
> > flag XDP_USE_NEED_WAKEUP, the driver will then set this flag if it has
> > no more buffers on the NIC Rx ring and yield to the application. For
> > Tx, it will set the flag if it has no outstanding Tx completion
> > interrupts and return to the application.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c
> > index d0ff5d8..42c9012 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c
> > @@ -626,6 +626,15 @@ int i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc(struct i40e_ring
> > *rx_ring, int budget)
> >
> >       i40e_finalize_xdp_rx(rx_ring, xdp_xmit);
> >       i40e_update_rx_stats(rx_ring, total_rx_bytes, total_rx_packets);
> > +
> > +     if (xsk_umem_uses_need_wakeup(rx_ring->xsk_umem)) {
> > +             if (failure || rx_ring->next_to_clean == rx_ring->next_to_use)
> > +                     xsk_set_rx_need_wakeup(rx_ring->xsk_umem);
> > +             else
> > +                     xsk_clear_rx_need_wakeup(rx_ring->xsk_umem);
> > +
> > +             return (int)total_rx_packets;
> > +     }
> >       return failure ? budget : (int)total_rx_packets;
>
> Can you elaborate why we're not returning the total budget on failure
> for the wakeup case?

In the non need_wakeup case (the old behavior), when allocation fails
from the fill queue we want to retry right away basically busy
spinning on the fill queue until we find at least one entry and then
go on processing packets. Works well when the app and the driver are
on different cores, but a lousy strategy when they execute on the same
core. That is why in the need_wakeup feature case, we do not return
the total budget if there is a failure. We will just come back at a
later point in time from a syscall since the need_wakeup flag will
have been set and check the fill queue again. We do not want a
busy-spinning behavior in this case.

Thanks: Magnus

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-14 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-14  7:27 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/8] add need_wakeup flag to the AF_XDP rings Magnus Karlsson
2019-08-14  7:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/8] xsk: replace ndo_xsk_async_xmit with ndo_xsk_wakeup Magnus Karlsson
2019-08-14 14:46   ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-14  7:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/8] xsk: add support for need_wakeup flag in AF_XDP rings Magnus Karlsson
2019-08-14 14:47   ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-14  7:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/8] i40e: add support for AF_XDP need_wakeup feature Magnus Karlsson
2019-08-14 14:48   ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-14 14:59     ` Magnus Karlsson [this message]
2019-08-14 15:42       ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-14 15:41   ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-14  7:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/8] ixgbe: " Magnus Karlsson
2019-08-14 15:41   ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-14  7:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 5/8] libbpf: add support for need_wakeup flag in AF_XDP part Magnus Karlsson
2019-08-14 14:49   ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-14  7:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 6/8] samples/bpf: add use of need_wakeup flag in xdpsock Magnus Karlsson
2019-08-14 14:53   ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-14  7:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 7/8] net/mlx5e: Move the SW XSK code from NAPI poll to a separate function Magnus Karlsson
2019-08-14 14:53   ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-14  7:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 8/8] net/mlx5e: Add AF_XDP need_wakeup support Magnus Karlsson
2019-08-14 15:40   ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-08-17 21:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/8] add need_wakeup flag to the AF_XDP rings Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJ8uoz0Tnb=i-LkGqLU87be9BuYqxmu2pN1Mte0UEWA2+f8bTQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=magnus.karlsson@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=ciara.loftus@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=kevin.laatz@intel.com \
    --cc=kiran.patil@intel.com \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=maciejromanfijalkowski@gmail.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=maximmi@mellanox.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
    --cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).