bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 梦龙董 <dongmenglong.8@bytedance.com>
To: Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@gmail.com>
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	 martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
	 yonghong.song@linux.dev, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	kpsingh@kernel.org,  sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com,
	jolsa@kernel.org, mykolal@fb.com,  shuah@kernel.org,
	mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com,
	 thinker.li@gmail.com, zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com,
	davemarchevsky@fb.com,  dxu@dxuuu.xyz,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] bpf: tracing: add support to record and check the accessed args
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:09:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALz3k9io7c6oGvCjfYr=1kb6Ndrh6RVgR5pHC5DzW-F_YGqjxA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81431b5d-0e0f-485a-a3ce-af8e63169552@gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 2:22 AM Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/19/24 19:51, Menglong Dong wrote:
> > In this commit, we add the 'accessed_args' field to struct bpf_prog_aux,
> > which is used to record the accessed index of the function args in
> > btf_ctx_access().
> >
> > Meanwhile, we add the function btf_check_func_part_match() to compare the
> > accessed function args of two function prototype. This function will be
> > used in the following commit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongmenglong.8@bytedance.com>
> > ---
> >   include/linux/bpf.h |   4 ++
> >   kernel/bpf/btf.c    | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   2 files changed, 125 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> > index c7aa99b44dbd..0225b8dbdd9d 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> > @@ -1464,6 +1464,7 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux {
> >       const struct btf_type *attach_func_proto;
> >       /* function name for valid attach_btf_id */
> >       const char *attach_func_name;
> > +     u64 accessed_args;
> >       struct bpf_prog **func;
> >       void *jit_data; /* JIT specific data. arch dependent */
> >       struct bpf_jit_poke_descriptor *poke_tab;
> > @@ -2566,6 +2567,9 @@ struct bpf_reg_state;
> >   int btf_prepare_func_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int subprog);
> >   int btf_check_type_match(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct bpf_prog *prog,
> >                        struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t);
> > +int btf_check_func_part_match(struct btf *btf1, const struct btf_type *t1,
> > +                           struct btf *btf2, const struct btf_type *t2,
> > +                           u64 func_args);
> >   const char *btf_find_decl_tag_value(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *pt,
> >                                   int comp_idx, const char *tag_key);
> >   int btf_find_next_decl_tag(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *pt,
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> > index 6ff0bd1a91d5..3a6931402fe4 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> > @@ -6203,6 +6203,9 @@ bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
> >               /* skip first 'void *__data' argument in btf_trace_##name typedef */
> >               args++;
> >               nr_args--;
> > +             prog->aux->accessed_args |= (1 << (arg + 1));
> > +     } else {
> > +             prog->aux->accessed_args |= (1 << arg);
> >       }
> >
> >       if (arg > nr_args) {
> > @@ -7010,6 +7013,124 @@ int btf_check_type_match(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct bpf_prog *pr
> >       return btf_check_func_type_match(log, btf1, t1, btf2, t2);
> >   }
> >
> > +static u32 get_ctx_arg_total_size(struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t)
> > +{
> > +     const struct btf_param *args;
> > +     u32 size = 0, nr_args;
> > +     int i;
> > +
> > +     nr_args = btf_type_vlen(t);
> > +     args = (const struct btf_param *)(t + 1);
> > +     for (i = 0; i < nr_args; i++) {
> > +             t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, args[i].type, NULL);
> > +             size += btf_type_is_ptr(t) ? 8 : roundup(t->size, 8);
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return size;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int get_ctx_arg_idx_aligned(struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
> > +                                int off)
> > +{
> > +     const struct btf_param *args;
> > +     u32 offset = 0, nr_args;
> > +     int i;
> > +
> > +     nr_args = btf_type_vlen(t);
> > +     args = (const struct btf_param *)(t + 1);
> > +     for (i = 0; i < nr_args; i++) {
> > +             if (offset == off)
> > +                     return i;
> > +
> > +             t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, args[i].type, NULL);
> > +             offset += btf_type_is_ptr(t) ? 8 : roundup(t->size, 8);
> > +             if (offset > off)
> > +                     return -1;
> > +     }
> > +     return -1;
> > +}
>
> This one is very similar to get_ctx_arg_idx().
> How about to refactor get_ctx_arg_idx() and share the code
> between get_ctx_arg_idx() and get_ctx_arg_idx_aligned().
>

This seems to work, I'll combine them in the next version.

Thanks for the example code!
Menglong Dong

> For example,
>
> -static u32 get_ctx_arg_idx(struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type
> *func_proto,
> -                          int off)
> +static u32 _get_ctx_arg_idx(struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type
> *func_proto,
> +                          int off, u32 *arg_off)
>   {
>          const struct btf_param *args;
>          const struct btf_type *t;
>          u32 offset = 0, nr_args;
>          int i;
>
>          if (!func_proto)
>                  return off / 8;
>
>          nr_args = btf_type_vlen(func_proto);
>          args = (const struct btf_param *)(func_proto + 1);
>          for (i = 0; i < nr_args; i++) {
> +               if (arg_off)
> +                       *arg_off = offset;
>                  t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, args[i].type, NULL);
>                  offset += btf_type_is_ptr(t) ? 8 : roundup(t->size, 8);
>                  if (off < offset)
>                          return i;
>          }
>
> +       if (arg_off)
> +               *arg_off = offset;
>          t = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, func_proto->type, NULL);
>          offset += btf_type_is_ptr(t) ? 8 : roundup(t->size, 8);
>          if (off < offset)
>                  return nr_args;
>
>          return nr_args + 1;
>   }
>
> +static u32 get_ctx_arg_idx(struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type
> *func_proto,
> +                          int off)
> +{
> +       return _get_ctx_arg_idx(btf, func_proto, off, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static u32 get_ctx_arg_idx_aligned(struct btf *btf,
> +                                  const struct btf_type *func_proto,
> +                                  int off)
> +{
> +       u32 arg_off;
> +       u32 arg_idx = _get_ctx_arg_idx(btf, func_proto, off, &arg_off);
> +       return arg_off == off ? arg_idx : -1;
> +}
> +
>
> > +
> > +/* This function is similar to btf_check_func_type_match(), except that it
> > + * only compare some function args of the function prototype t1 and t2.
> > + */
> > +int btf_check_func_part_match(struct btf *btf1, const struct btf_type *func1,
> > +                           struct btf *btf2, const struct btf_type *func2,
> > +                           u64 func_args)
> > +{
> > +     const struct btf_param *args1, *args2;
> > +     u32 nargs1, i, offset = 0;
> > +     const char *s1, *s2;
> > +
> > +     if (!btf_type_is_func_proto(func1) || !btf_type_is_func_proto(func2))
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +     args1 = (const struct btf_param *)(func1 + 1);
> > +     args2 = (const struct btf_param *)(func2 + 1);
> > +     nargs1 = btf_type_vlen(func1);
> > +
> > +     for (i = 0; i <= nargs1; i++) {
> > +             const struct btf_type *t1, *t2;
> > +
> > +             if (!(func_args & (1 << i)))
> > +                     goto next;
> > +
> > +             if (i < nargs1) {
> > +                     int t2_index;
> > +
> > +                     /* get the index of the arg corresponding to args1[i]
> > +                      * by the offset.
> > +                      */
> > +                     t2_index = get_ctx_arg_idx_aligned(btf2, func2,
> > +                                                        offset);
> > +                     if (t2_index < 0)
> > +                             return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +                     t1 = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf1, args1[i].type, NULL);
> > +                     t2 = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf2, args2[t2_index].type,
> > +                                                  NULL);
> > +             } else {
> > +                     /* i == nargs1, this is the index of return value of t1 */
> > +                     if (get_ctx_arg_total_size(btf1, func1) !=
> > +                         get_ctx_arg_total_size(btf2, func2))
> > +                             return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +                     /* check the return type of t1 and t2 */
> > +                     t1 = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf1, func1->type, NULL);
> > +                     t2 = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf2, func2->type, NULL);
> > +             }
> > +
> > +             if (t1->info != t2->info ||
> > +                 (btf_type_has_size(t1) && t1->size != t2->size))
> > +                     return -EINVAL;
> > +             if (btf_type_is_int(t1) || btf_is_any_enum(t1))
> > +                     goto next;
> > +
> > +             if (btf_type_is_struct(t1))
> > +                     goto on_struct;
> > +
> > +             if (!btf_type_is_ptr(t1))
> > +                     return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +             t1 = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf1, t1->type, NULL);
> > +             t2 = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf2, t2->type, NULL);
> > +             if (!btf_type_is_struct(t1) || !btf_type_is_struct(t2))
> > +                     return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +on_struct:
> > +             s1 = btf_name_by_offset(btf1, t1->name_off);
> > +             s2 = btf_name_by_offset(btf2, t2->name_off);
> > +             if (strcmp(s1, s2))
> > +                     return -EINVAL;
> > +next:
> > +             if (i < nargs1) {
> > +                     t1 = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf1, args1[i].type, NULL);
> > +                     offset += btf_type_is_ptr(t1) ? 8 : roundup(t1->size, 8);
> > +             }
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >   static bool btf_is_dynptr_ptr(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t)
> >   {
> >       const char *name;

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-21  3:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-20  3:51 [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf: make tracing program support multi-attach Menglong Dong
2024-02-20  3:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] bpf: tracing: add support to record and check the accessed args Menglong Dong
2024-02-20 17:18   ` Jiri Olsa
2024-02-21  2:58     ` [External] " 梦龙董
2024-02-20 18:22   ` Kui-Feng Lee
2024-02-21  3:09     ` 梦龙董 [this message]
2024-02-20  3:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] bpf: tracing: support to attach program to multi hooks Menglong Dong
2024-02-20 17:18   ` Jiri Olsa
2024-02-21  5:31   ` Dan Carpenter
2024-02-20  3:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/5] libbpf: allow to set coookie when target_btf_id is set in bpf_link_create Menglong Dong
2024-02-20  3:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] libbpf: add the function libbpf_find_kernel_btf_id() Menglong Dong
2024-02-20  3:51 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: add test cases for multiple attach of tracing program Menglong Dong
2024-02-21  1:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf: make tracing program support multi-attach Alexei Starovoitov
2024-02-21  2:35   ` [External] " 梦龙董
2024-02-21  2:45     ` 梦龙董
2024-02-21  3:02       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-02-21  3:06         ` 梦龙董
2024-02-21  3:18           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-02-21  3:57             ` 梦龙董

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALz3k9io7c6oGvCjfYr=1kb6Ndrh6RVgR5pHC5DzW-F_YGqjxA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dongmenglong.8@bytedance.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davemarchevsky@fb.com \
    --cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=thinker.li@gmail.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).