bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
To: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	 Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	 Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	 bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: cap BPF_PROG_PACK_SIZE to 2MB * num_possible_nodes()
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 08:55:15 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW7Do8c8cA6rVykhVnFRgKA0s6nO8JyGXkEB7gm94KR7Mw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240308120712.88122-1-puranjay12@gmail.com>

On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 4:07 AM Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On some architectures like ARM64, PMD_SIZE can be really large in some
> configurations. Like with CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y the PMD_SIZE is
> 512MB.
>
> Use 2MB * num_possible_nodes() as the upper limit for allocations done
> through the prog pack allocator.
>
> Fixes: ea2babac63d4 ("bpf: Simplify bpf_prog_pack_[size|mask]")
> Reported-by: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@kernelci.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/7e216c88-77ee-47b8-becc-a0f780868d3c@sirena.org.uk/
> Suggested-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
> ---
>  kernel/bpf/core.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> index 134b7979f537..83a3b6964e54 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> @@ -893,8 +893,17 @@ static LIST_HEAD(pack_list);
>   * CONFIG_MMU=n. Use PAGE_SIZE in these cases.
>   */
>  #ifdef PMD_SIZE
> +/*
> + * PMD_SIZE is really big for some archs. It doesn't make sense to
> + * reserve too much memory in one allocation. Cap BPF_PROG_PACK_SIZE to
> + * 2MiB * num_possible_nodes().
> + */

In BPF code, we prefer a different style of multiple line comments:

/* PMD_SIZE is really big for some archs. It doesn't make sense to
 * reserve too much memory in one allocation. Cap BPF_PROG_PACK_SIZE to
 * 2MiB * num_possible_nodes().
 */

Other than this, this looks good to me.

Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>

Thanks,
Song

> +#if PMD_SIZE <= (1 << 21)
>  #define BPF_PROG_PACK_SIZE (PMD_SIZE * num_possible_nodes())
>  #else
> +#define BPF_PROG_PACK_SIZE ((1 << 21) * num_possible_nodes())
> +#endif
> +#else
>  #define BPF_PROG_PACK_SIZE PAGE_SIZE
>  #endif

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-08 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-08 12:07 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: cap BPF_PROG_PACK_SIZE to 2MB * num_possible_nodes() Puranjay Mohan
2024-03-08 16:55 ` Song Liu [this message]
2024-03-08 23:08   ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPhsuW7Do8c8cA6rVykhVnFRgKA0s6nO8JyGXkEB7gm94KR7Mw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=puranjay12@gmail.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).