From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, lizefan.x@bytedance.com,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, yosryahmed@google.com, mkoutny@suse.com,
sinquersw@gmail.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 2/8] cgroup: Add new helpers for cgroup1 hierarchy
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 05:55:33 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZSF_daEXs8xpvlo0@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231007140304.4390-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Hello,
On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 02:02:58PM +0000, Yafang Shao wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup.h b/include/linux/cgroup.h
> index b307013b9c6c..65bde6eb41ef 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cgroup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h
> @@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ struct css_task_iter {
> extern struct file_system_type cgroup_fs_type;
> extern struct cgroup_root cgrp_dfl_root;
> extern struct css_set init_css_set;
> +extern struct list_head cgroup_roots;
> +extern spinlock_t css_set_lock;
css_set_lock was already out here but why do we need to move cgrou_roots to
this header?
> +/**
> + * task_cgroup_id_within_hierarchy - Retrieves the associated cgroup ID from
> + * a task within a specific cgroup1 hierarchy.
> + * @task: The task to be tested
> + * @hierarchy_id: The hierarchy ID of a cgroup1
> + *
> + * We limit it to cgroup1 only.
> + */
> +u64 task_cgroup1_id_within_hierarchy(struct task_struct *tsk, int hierarchy_id)
> +{
...
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * task_ancestor_cgroup_id_within_hierarchy - Retrieves the associated ancestor
> + * cgroup ID from a task within a specific cgroup1 hierarchy.
> + * @task: The task to be tested
> + * @hierarchy_id: The hierarchy ID of a cgroup1
> + * @ancestor_level: level of ancestor to find starting from root
> + *
> + * We limit it to cgroup1 only.
> + */
> +u64 task_ancestor_cgroup1_id_within_hierarchy(struct task_struct *tsk, int hierarchy_id,
> + int ancestor_level)
> +{
...
> +}
I'd much prefer to have `struct group *task_get_cgroup1_within_hierarchy()`
then the caller can do cgroup_ancestor() itself.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-07 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-07 14:02 [RFC PATCH bpf-next 0/8] bpf, cgroup: Add BPF support for cgroup1 hierarchy Yafang Shao
2023-10-07 14:02 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/8] cgroup: Don't have to hold cgroup_mutex in task_cgroup_from_root() Yafang Shao
2023-10-07 15:50 ` Tejun Heo
2023-10-08 2:32 ` Yafang Shao
2023-10-09 14:45 ` Michal Koutný
2023-10-10 3:58 ` Yafang Shao
2023-10-10 8:29 ` Michal Koutný
2023-10-10 11:58 ` Yafang Shao
2023-10-07 14:02 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 2/8] cgroup: Add new helpers for cgroup1 hierarchy Yafang Shao
2023-10-07 15:55 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2023-10-08 2:36 ` Yafang Shao
2023-10-09 11:32 ` Michal Koutný
2023-10-09 13:10 ` Yafang Shao
2023-10-09 14:48 ` Michal Koutný
2023-10-10 3:59 ` Yafang Shao
2023-10-07 14:02 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 3/8] bpf: Add kfuncs " Yafang Shao
2023-10-07 15:57 ` Tejun Heo
2023-10-08 2:37 ` Yafang Shao
2023-10-07 14:03 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 4/8] selftests/bpf: Fix issues in setup_classid_environment() Yafang Shao
2023-10-07 14:03 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 5/8] selftests/bpf: Add parallel support for classid Yafang Shao
2023-10-07 14:03 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 6/8] selftests/bpf: Add a new cgroup helper get_classid_cgroup_id() Yafang Shao
2023-10-07 14:03 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 7/8] selftests/bpf: Add a new cgroup helper get_cgroup_hierarchy_id() Yafang Shao
2023-10-07 14:03 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 8/8] selftests/bpf: Add selftests for cgroup1 hierarchy Yafang Shao
2023-10-09 11:46 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 0/8] bpf, cgroup: Add BPF support " Michal Koutný
2023-10-09 13:11 ` Yafang Shao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZSF_daEXs8xpvlo0@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).