From: Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@gmail.com>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <kafai@fb.com>,
"Song Liu" <songliubraving@fb.com>, "Yonghong Song" <yhs@fb.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
"Jamal Hadi Salim" <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
"Cong Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
"Jiri Pirko" <jiri@resnulli.us>,
"Pablo Neira Ayuso" <pablo@netfilter.org>,
"Jozsef Kadlecsik" <kadlec@netfilter.org>,
"Florian Westphal" <fw@strlen.de>,
"Pravin B Shelar" <pshelar@ovn.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
William Tu <u9012063@gmail.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 bpf-next 00/15] xdp_flow: Flow offload to XDP
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 19:11:36 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c1b7ff64-6574-74c7-cd6b-5aa353ec80ce@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87blthox30.fsf@toke.dk>
On 2019/11/13 1:53, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> Hi Toke,
>>
>> Sorry for the delay.
>>
>> On 2019/10/31 21:12, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>> Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 2019/10/28 0:21, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>>>> Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>>>> Yeah, you are right that it's something we're thinking about. I'm not
>>>>>>> sure we'll actually have the bandwidth to implement a complete solution
>>>>>>> ourselves, but we are very much interested in helping others do this,
>>>>>>> including smoothing out any rough edges (or adding missing features) in
>>>>>>> the core XDP feature set that is needed to achieve this :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm very interested in general usability solutions.
>>>>>> I'd appreciate if you could join the discussion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here the basic idea of my approach is to reuse HW-offload infrastructure
>>>>>> in kernel.
>>>>>> Typical networking features in kernel have offload mechanism (TC flower,
>>>>>> nftables, bridge, routing, and so on).
>>>>>> In general these are what users want to accelerate, so easy XDP use also
>>>>>> should support these features IMO. With this idea, reusing existing
>>>>>> HW-offload mechanism is a natural way to me. OVS uses TC to offload
>>>>>> flows, then use TC for XDP as well...
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree that XDP should be able to accelerate existing kernel
>>>>> functionality. However, this does not necessarily mean that the kernel
>>>>> has to generate an XDP program and install it, like your patch does.
>>>>> Rather, what we should be doing is exposing the functionality through
>>>>> helpers so XDP can hook into the data structures already present in the
>>>>> kernel and make decisions based on what is contained there. We already
>>>>> have that for routing; L2 bridging, and some kind of connection
>>>>> tracking, are obvious contenders for similar additions.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, adding helpers itself should be good, but how does this let users
>>>> start using XDP without having them write their own BPF code?
>>>
>>> It wouldn't in itself. But it would make it possible to write XDP
>>> programs that could provide the same functionality; people would then
>>> need to run those programs to actually opt-in to this.
>>>
>>> For some cases this would be a simple "on/off switch", e.g.,
>>> "xdp-route-accel --load <dev>", which would install an XDP program that
>>> uses the regular kernel routing table (and the same with bridging). We
>>> are planning to collect such utilities in the xdp-tools repo - I am
>>> currently working on a simple packet filter:
>>> https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-tools/tree/xdp-filter
>>
>> Let me confirm how this tool adds filter rules.
>> Is this adding another commandline tool for firewall?
>>
>> If so, that is different from my goal.
>> Introducing another commandline tool will require people to learn
>> more.
>>
>> My proposal is to reuse kernel interface to minimize such need for
>> learning.
>
> I wasn't proposing that this particular tool should be a replacement for
> the kernel packet filter; it's deliberately fairly limited in
> functionality. My point was that we could create other such tools for
> specific use cases which could be more or less drop-in (similar to how
> nftables has a command line tool that is compatible with the iptables
> syntax).
>
> I'm all for exposing more of the existing kernel capabilities to XDP.
> However, I think it's the wrong approach to do this by reimplementing
> the functionality in eBPF program and replicating the state in maps;
> instead, it's better to refactor the existing kernel functionality to it
> can be called directly from an eBPF helper function. And then ship a
> tool as part of xdp-tools that installs an XDP program to make use of
> these helpers to accelerate the functionality.
>
> Take your example of TC rules: You were proposing a flow like this:
>
> Userspace TC rule -> kernel rule table -> eBPF map -> generated XDP
> program
>
> Whereas what I mean is that we could do this instead:
>
> Userspace TC rule -> kernel rule table
>
> and separately
>
> XDP program -> bpf helper -> lookup in kernel rule table
Thanks, now I see what you mean.
You expect an XDP program like this, right?
int xdp_tc(struct xdp_md *ctx)
{
int act = bpf_xdp_tc_filter(ctx);
return act;
}
But doesn't this way lose a chance to reduce/minimize the program
to only use necessary features for this device?
Toshiaki Makita
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-14 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-18 4:07 [RFC PATCH v2 bpf-next 00/15] xdp_flow: Flow offload to XDP Toshiaki Makita
2019-10-18 4:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 bpf-next 01/15] xdp_flow: Add skeleton of XDP based flow offload driver Toshiaki Makita
2019-10-18 4:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 bpf-next 02/15] xdp_flow: Add skeleton bpf program for XDP Toshiaki Makita
2019-10-18 4:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 bpf-next 03/15] bpf: Add API to get program from id Toshiaki Makita
2019-10-18 4:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 bpf-next 04/15] xdp: Export dev_check_xdp and dev_change_xdp Toshiaki Makita
2019-10-18 4:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 bpf-next 05/15] xdp_flow: Attach bpf prog to XDP in kernel after UMH loaded program Toshiaki Makita
2019-10-18 4:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 bpf-next 06/15] xdp_flow: Prepare flow tables in bpf Toshiaki Makita
2019-10-18 4:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 bpf-next 07/15] xdp_flow: Add flow entry insertion/deletion logic in UMH Toshiaki Makita
2019-10-18 4:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 bpf-next 08/15] xdp_flow: Add flow handling and basic actions in bpf prog Toshiaki Makita
2019-10-18 4:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 bpf-next 09/15] xdp_flow: Implement flow replacement/deletion logic in xdp_flow kmod Toshiaki Makita
2019-10-18 4:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 bpf-next 10/15] xdp_flow: Add netdev feature for enabling flow offload to XDP Toshiaki Makita
2019-10-18 4:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 bpf-next 11/15] xdp_flow: Implement redirect action Toshiaki Makita
2019-10-18 4:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 bpf-next 12/15] xdp_flow: Implement vlan_push action Toshiaki Makita
2019-10-18 4:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 bpf-next 13/15] bpf, selftest: Add test for xdp_flow Toshiaki Makita
2019-10-18 4:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 bpf-next 14/15] i40e: prefetch xdp->data before running XDP prog Toshiaki Makita
2019-10-18 4:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 bpf-next 15/15] bpf, hashtab: Compare keys in long Toshiaki Makita
2019-10-18 15:22 ` [RFC PATCH v2 bpf-next 00/15] xdp_flow: Flow offload to XDP John Fastabend
2019-10-21 7:31 ` Toshiaki Makita
2019-10-22 16:54 ` John Fastabend
2019-10-22 17:45 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-24 4:27 ` John Fastabend
2019-10-24 10:13 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-27 13:19 ` Toshiaki Makita
2019-10-27 15:21 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-28 3:16 ` David Ahern
2019-10-28 8:36 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-28 10:08 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-10-28 19:07 ` David Ahern
2019-10-28 19:05 ` David Ahern
2019-10-31 0:18 ` Toshiaki Makita
2019-10-31 12:12 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-11-11 7:32 ` Toshiaki Makita
2019-11-12 16:53 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-11-14 10:11 ` Toshiaki Makita [this message]
2019-11-14 12:41 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-11-18 6:41 ` Toshiaki Makita
2019-11-18 10:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-11-22 5:42 ` Toshiaki Makita
2019-11-22 11:54 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-11-25 10:18 ` Toshiaki Makita
2019-11-25 13:03 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-11-18 10:28 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-27 13:13 ` Toshiaki Makita
2019-10-27 15:24 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-27 19:17 ` David Miller
2019-10-31 0:32 ` Toshiaki Makita
2019-11-12 17:50 ` William Tu
2019-11-14 10:06 ` Toshiaki Makita
2019-11-14 17:09 ` William Tu
2019-11-15 13:16 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-11-12 17:38 ` William Tu
2019-10-23 14:11 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2019-10-24 4:38 ` John Fastabend
2019-10-24 17:05 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2019-10-27 13:27 ` Toshiaki Makita
2019-10-27 13:06 ` Toshiaki Makita
2019-10-21 11:23 ` Björn Töpel
2019-10-21 11:47 ` Toshiaki Makita
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c1b7ff64-6574-74c7-cd6b-5aa353ec80ce@gmail.com \
--to=toshiaki.makita1@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=u9012063@gmail.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).